205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-5.74%
Negative revenue growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate if the company is losing market share or facing a declining industry.
0.15%
Gross profit growth of 0.15% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that could be built upon.
-20.25%
Negative EBIT growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check if external or internal factors caused the decline.
2.69%
Operating income growth of 2.69% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that can expand.
-16.12%
Negative net income growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate factors dragging net income down.
-17.24%
Negative EPS growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would explore whether share dilution or profit declines are to blame.
-14.29%
Negative diluted EPS growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would look for the cause: weakened profitability or heavier share issuance.
-1.33%
Share reduction while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a relative advantage if others are diluting.
-1.36%
Diluted share reduction while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if others are still diluting.
-0.95%
Dividend cuts while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others maintain or grow payouts, highlighting a relative weakness.
-59.92%
Negative OCF growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would ask if accounting or macro issues hamper the firm specifically.
-77.51%
Negative FCF growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others in the industry are still generating positive expansions in free cash.
-9.32%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while Technology median is 30.54%. Seth Klarman would see if the entire sector or just this company faces long-term decline.
3.28%
5Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 0.57%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company’s moat drives rapid mid-term expansion.
81.70%
3Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 13.91%. Joel Greenblatt might see a short-term competitive advantage at play.
96.01%
OCF/share CAGR of 96.01% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest edge that can add up if momentum improves.
24.83%
OCF/share CAGR of 24.83% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that can compound if momentum builds.
97.36%
3Y OCF/share growth of 97.36% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that could compound if momentum holds.
56.05%
Net income/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 20.84% over a decade. Joel Greenblatt might see a standout compounder of earnings.
-6.33%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a specific weakness if peers maintain profitable expansions.
1308.11%
3Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 57.35%. Joel Greenblatt might see a recent surge from market share gains or cost synergy.
217.61%
Equity/share CAGR of 217.61% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage in net worth accumulation that could matter long term.
1.99%
5Y equity/share CAGR of 1.99% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight positive that might compound if management executes well.
12.23%
3Y equity/share CAGR of 12.23% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a modest short-term advantage that could compound if momentum persists.
63.26%
Dividend/share CAGR of 63.26% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a minor improvement that could compound if the firm maintains consistent raises.
17.88%
5Y dividend/share CAGR of 17.88% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees at least some improvement that could compound over time.
29.81%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 29.81% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if the firm is at least inching up payouts.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.88%
Decreasing inventory while Technology is rising. Seth Klarman might see an efficiency advantage or possibly a sign of weaker sales future.
-7.69%
Assets shrink while Technology median grows. Seth Klarman might see a strategic refocus or potential missed expansion if demand is present.
-7.64%
Negative BV/share change while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a firm-specific weakness if peers accumulate net worth.
-1.58%
Debt is shrinking while Technology median is rising. Seth Klarman might see an advantage if growth remains possible.
1.43%
R&D growth of 1.43% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss wonders if a slight increase yields a meaningful competitive edge.
-4.97%
SG&A decline while Technology grows. Seth Klarman sees potential cost advantage or a risk if it hurts future growth.