205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
0.06%
Revenue growth below 50% of Technology median of 0.94%. Jim Chanos would be concerned about potential secular decline.
-2.03%
Negative gross profit growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect poor product pricing or inefficient production.
6.44%
EBIT growth of 6.44% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss would see a marginal edge that could be expanded upon.
6.44%
Operating income growth of 6.44% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that can expand.
3.80%
Net income growth of 3.80% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see potential if moderate gains can keep rising.
5.13%
EPS growth of 5.13% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
5.26%
Diluted EPS growth of 5.26% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could improve over time.
-1.23%
Share reduction while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a relative advantage if others are diluting.
-1.50%
Diluted share reduction while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if others are still diluting.
194294.01%
Dividend growth of 194294.01% while Technology median is flat. Walter Schloss might appreciate at least a modest improvement.
-40.03%
Negative OCF growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would ask if accounting or macro issues hamper the firm specifically.
-47.18%
Negative FCF growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others in the industry are still generating positive expansions in free cash.
-5.84%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while Technology median is 20.73%. Seth Klarman would see if the entire sector or just this company faces long-term decline.
28.37%
5Y CAGR of 28.37% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight improvement that could compound if momentum builds.
70.09%
3Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 22.24%. Joel Greenblatt might see a short-term competitive advantage at play.
61.20%
OCF/share CAGR of 61.20% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest edge that can add up if momentum improves.
49.82%
OCF/share CAGR of 49.82% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that can compound if momentum builds.
24.02%
3Y OCF/share growth of 24.02% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that could compound if momentum holds.
112.59%
Net income/share CAGR of 112.59% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a marginal edge that can grow if the firm invests wisely.
11.83%
5Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 3.20%. Joel Greenblatt might see superior mid-term capital allocation or product strength.
213.01%
3Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 67.36%. Joel Greenblatt might see a recent surge from market share gains or cost synergy.
175.31%
Equity/share CAGR of 175.31% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage in net worth accumulation that could matter long term.
2.48%
5Y equity/share CAGR of 2.48% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight positive that might compound if management executes well.
13.01%
3Y equity/share CAGR of 13.01% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a modest short-term advantage that could compound if momentum persists.
37.38%
Dividend/share CAGR of 37.38% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a minor improvement that could compound if the firm maintains consistent raises.
40.20%
5Y dividend/share CAGR of 40.20% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees at least some improvement that could compound over time.
35.49%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 35.49% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if the firm is at least inching up payouts.
-13.94%
AR shrinking while Technology median grows. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage unless it signals declining demand.
9.93%
Inventory growth of 9.93% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if we’re preparing for a sales push or risking overstock.
0.53%
Asset growth of 0.53% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if expansions yield good returns on capital.
1.79%
BV/share growth of 1.79% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight lead that can expand if sustained over time.
84.64%
Debt growth of 84.64% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest difference that matters if interest coverage is tight.
-5.12%
R&D dropping while Technology median is rising. Seth Klarman wonders if we risk ceding future innovation or if peers overspend.
4.17%
SG&A growth of 4.17% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a modest overhead increase needing revenue justification.