PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-7.18%
Negative revenue growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate if the company is losing market share or facing a declining industry.
-3.63%
Negative gross profit growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect poor product pricing or inefficient production.
-11.36%
Negative EBIT growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check if external or internal factors caused the decline.
-11.36%
Negative operating income growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check if structural or cyclical issues are at play.
-10.69%
Negative net income growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate factors dragging net income down.
-9.76%
Negative EPS growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would explore whether share dilution or profit declines are to blame.
-10.00%
Negative diluted EPS growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would look for the cause: weakened profitability or heavier share issuance.
-1.18%
Share reduction while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a relative advantage if others are diluting.
-1.22%
Diluted share reduction while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if others are still diluting.
1.20%
Dividend growth of 1.20% while Technology median is flat. Walter Schloss might appreciate at least a modest improvement.
-38.66%
Negative OCF growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would ask if accounting or macro issues hamper the firm specifically.
-73.49%
Negative FCF growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others in the industry are still generating positive expansions in free cash.
19.20%
10Y revenue/share CAGR 50-75% of Technology median of 34.23%. Guy Spier would worry about subpar top-line expansion over the long run.
47.21%
5Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 5.65%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company’s moat drives rapid mid-term expansion.
60.39%
3Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 26.26%. Joel Greenblatt might see a short-term competitive advantage at play.
839.85%
OCF/share CAGR of 839.85% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest edge that can add up if momentum improves.
422.47%
OCF/share CAGR of 422.47% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that can compound if momentum builds.
199.68%
3Y OCF/share growth of 199.68% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that could compound if momentum holds.
243.23%
Net income/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 31.18% over a decade. Joel Greenblatt might see a standout compounder of earnings.
183.91%
5Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 21.94%. Joel Greenblatt might see superior mid-term capital allocation or product strength.
427.26%
3Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 65.38%. Joel Greenblatt might see a recent surge from market share gains or cost synergy.
154.02%
Equity/share CAGR of 154.02% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage in net worth accumulation that could matter long term.
-3.52%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman suspects firm-specific weaknesses if peers grow equity mid-term.
10.46%
3Y equity/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 0.53%. Joel Greenblatt sees strong short-term returns on equity fueling net worth growth.
43.45%
Dividend/share CAGR of 43.45% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a minor improvement that could compound if the firm maintains consistent raises.
44.81%
5Y dividend/share CAGR of 44.81% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees at least some improvement that could compound over time.
36.80%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 36.80% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if the firm is at least inching up payouts.
9.10%
AR growth of 9.10% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if the difference points to new credit strategy or stronger sales push.
-2.12%
Decreasing inventory while Technology is rising. Seth Klarman might see an efficiency advantage or possibly a sign of weaker sales future.
-6.80%
Assets shrink while Technology median grows. Seth Klarman might see a strategic refocus or potential missed expansion if demand is present.
-4.73%
Negative BV/share change while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a firm-specific weakness if peers accumulate net worth.
-51.89%
Debt is shrinking while Technology median is rising. Seth Klarman might see an advantage if growth remains possible.
6.60%
R&D growth of 6.60% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss wonders if a slight increase yields a meaningful competitive edge.
-0.94%
SG&A decline while Technology grows. Seth Klarman sees potential cost advantage or a risk if it hurts future growth.