PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
10.89%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 2.93%. Joel Greenblatt would verify if operating margins keep pace with this top-line surge.
14.06%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 2.89%. Joel Greenblatt would check if cost advantages or brand equity drive this surge.
32.73%
EBIT growth of 32.73% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss would see a marginal edge that could be expanded upon.
32.73%
Operating income growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 2.43%. Joel Greenblatt would see if unique processes drive exceptional profitability.
308.03%
Net income growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 6.00%. Joel Greenblatt would check if brand strength or cost advantages fuel this outperformance.
316.22%
EPS growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 3.60%. Joel Greenblatt would confirm if consistent earnings expansion underpins these gains.
316.67%
Diluted EPS growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 2.57%. Joel Greenblatt would confirm if strong net income growth or buybacks drive outperformance.
-2.02%
Share reduction while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a relative advantage if others are diluting.
-1.98%
Diluted share reduction while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if others are still diluting.
-0.07%
Dividend cuts while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others maintain or grow payouts, highlighting a relative weakness.
14.72%
OCF growth of 14.72% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest positive difference, which can compound over time.
77.85%
FCF growth of 77.85% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
50.46%
10Y revenue/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 21.19%. Joel Greenblatt would verify if a unique moat or brand fosters outperformance over a decade.
109.30%
5Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 13.85%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company’s moat drives rapid mid-term expansion.
75.93%
3Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 25.35%. Joel Greenblatt might see a short-term competitive advantage at play.
278.11%
OCF/share CAGR of 278.11% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest edge that can add up if momentum improves.
25.75%
OCF/share CAGR of 25.75% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that can compound if momentum builds.
88.16%
3Y OCF/share growth of 88.16% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that could compound if momentum holds.
2966.45%
Net income/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 30.51% over a decade. Joel Greenblatt might see a standout compounder of earnings.
1497.30%
5Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 65.39%. Joel Greenblatt might see superior mid-term capital allocation or product strength.
2095.75%
3Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 64.26%. Joel Greenblatt might see a recent surge from market share gains or cost synergy.
191.78%
Equity/share CAGR of 191.78% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage in net worth accumulation that could matter long term.
16.42%
5Y equity/share CAGR of 16.42% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight positive that might compound if management executes well.
30.08%
3Y equity/share CAGR of 30.08% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a modest short-term advantage that could compound if momentum persists.
42.42%
Dividend/share CAGR of 42.42% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a minor improvement that could compound if the firm maintains consistent raises.
46.49%
5Y dividend/share CAGR of 46.49% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees at least some improvement that could compound over time.
41.39%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 41.39% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if the firm is at least inching up payouts.
7.29%
AR growth of 7.29% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if the difference points to new credit strategy or stronger sales push.
7.14%
Inventory growth of 7.14% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if we’re preparing for a sales push or risking overstock.
13.46%
Asset growth of 13.46% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if expansions yield good returns on capital.
16.14%
BV/share growth of 16.14% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight lead that can expand if sustained over time.
-86.48%
Debt is shrinking while Technology median is rising. Seth Klarman might see an advantage if growth remains possible.
0.56%
R&D growth of 0.56% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss wonders if a slight increase yields a meaningful competitive edge.
-0.71%
SG&A decline while Technology grows. Seth Klarman sees potential cost advantage or a risk if it hurts future growth.