PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
1.73%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 0.48%. Joel Greenblatt would verify if operating margins keep pace with this top-line surge.
1.31%
Gross profit growth of 1.31% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that could be built upon.
-2.41%
Negative EBIT growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check if external or internal factors caused the decline.
-2.41%
Negative operating income growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check if structural or cyclical issues are at play.
-70.59%
Negative net income growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate factors dragging net income down.
-69.48%
Negative EPS growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would explore whether share dilution or profit declines are to blame.
-69.33%
Negative diluted EPS growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would look for the cause: weakened profitability or heavier share issuance.
-3.03%
Share reduction while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a relative advantage if others are diluting.
-3.09%
Diluted share reduction while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if others are still diluting.
0.93%
Dividend growth of 0.93% while Technology median is flat. Walter Schloss might appreciate at least a modest improvement.
-34.43%
Negative OCF growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would ask if accounting or macro issues hamper the firm specifically.
-46.04%
Negative FCF growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others in the industry are still generating positive expansions in free cash.
57.48%
10Y revenue/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 36.54%. Joel Greenblatt would verify if a unique moat or brand fosters outperformance over a decade.
125.75%
5Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 29.51%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company’s moat drives rapid mid-term expansion.
69.50%
3Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 27.75%. Joel Greenblatt might see a short-term competitive advantage at play.
176.00%
OCF/share CAGR of 176.00% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest edge that can add up if momentum improves.
39.23%
OCF/share CAGR of 39.23% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that can compound if momentum builds.
-6.21%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check whether it’s cyclical or a firm-specific problem.
581.29%
Net income/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 57.61% over a decade. Joel Greenblatt might see a standout compounder of earnings.
765.91%
5Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 94.25%. Joel Greenblatt might see superior mid-term capital allocation or product strength.
79.28%
3Y net income/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x Technology median. Mohnish Pabrai would confirm expansions or margin boosts drive the short-term advantage.
194.56%
Equity/share CAGR of 194.56% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage in net worth accumulation that could matter long term.
15.59%
5Y equity/share CAGR of 15.59% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight positive that might compound if management executes well.
20.14%
3Y equity/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 5.99%. Joel Greenblatt sees strong short-term returns on equity fueling net worth growth.
40.48%
Dividend/share CAGR of 40.48% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a minor improvement that could compound if the firm maintains consistent raises.
37.98%
5Y dividend/share CAGR of 37.98% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees at least some improvement that could compound over time.
41.93%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 41.93% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if the firm is at least inching up payouts.
8.29%
AR growth of 8.29% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if the difference points to new credit strategy or stronger sales push.
11.69%
Inventory growth of 11.69% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if we’re preparing for a sales push or risking overstock.
-7.18%
Assets shrink while Technology median grows. Seth Klarman might see a strategic refocus or potential missed expansion if demand is present.
-3.02%
Negative BV/share change while Technology median is 0.56%. Seth Klarman sees a firm-specific weakness if peers accumulate net worth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
6.34%
R&D growth of 6.34% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss wonders if a slight increase yields a meaningful competitive edge.
3.35%
SG&A growth of 3.35% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a modest overhead increase needing revenue justification.