205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
1.07%
Revenue growth of 1.07% vs. zero growth in Technology. Walter Schloss might still want to see if it can translate into profits.
-6.06%
Negative gross profit growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect poor product pricing or inefficient production.
-10.44%
Negative EBIT growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check if external or internal factors caused the decline.
-10.44%
Negative operating income growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check if structural or cyclical issues are at play.
-4.25%
Negative net income growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate factors dragging net income down.
-4.44%
Negative EPS growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would explore whether share dilution or profit declines are to blame.
-2.27%
Negative diluted EPS growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would look for the cause: weakened profitability or heavier share issuance.
-1.21%
Share reduction while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a relative advantage if others are diluting.
-1.72%
Diluted share reduction while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if others are still diluting.
0.46%
Dividend growth of 0.46% while Technology median is flat. Walter Schloss might appreciate at least a modest improvement.
102.70%
OCF growth of 102.70% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest positive difference, which can compound over time.
243.37%
FCF growth of 243.37% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
91.91%
10Y CAGR of 91.91% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that can compound over very long horizons.
76.29%
5Y CAGR of 76.29% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight improvement that could compound if momentum builds.
17.50%
3Y CAGR of 17.50% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest improvement overshadowing the broader sector’s stagnation.
123.71%
OCF/share CAGR of 123.71% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest edge that can add up if momentum improves.
171.96%
OCF/share CAGR of 171.96% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that can compound if momentum builds.
-13.46%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check whether it’s cyclical or a firm-specific problem.
311.00%
Net income/share CAGR of 311.00% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a marginal edge that can grow if the firm invests wisely.
66.06%
Net income/share CAGR of 66.06% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that can expand mid-term.
11.12%
3Y net income/share CAGR of 11.12% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a small advantage that can be scaled further.
100.48%
Equity/share CAGR of 100.48% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage in net worth accumulation that could matter long term.
16.45%
5Y equity/share CAGR of 16.45% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight positive that might compound if management executes well.
5.88%
3Y equity/share CAGR of 5.88% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a modest short-term advantage that could compound if momentum persists.
361.29%
Dividend/share CAGR of 361.29% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a minor improvement that could compound if the firm maintains consistent raises.
366.79%
5Y dividend/share CAGR of 366.79% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees at least some improvement that could compound over time.
652488.96%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 652488.96% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if the firm is at least inching up payouts.
-2.04%
AR shrinking while Technology median grows. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage unless it signals declining demand.
-4.60%
Decreasing inventory while Technology is rising. Seth Klarman might see an efficiency advantage or possibly a sign of weaker sales future.
0.68%
Asset growth of 0.68% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if expansions yield good returns on capital.
2.34%
BV/share growth of 2.34% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight lead that can expand if sustained over time.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3.89%
R&D growth of 3.89% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss wonders if a slight increase yields a meaningful competitive edge.
-8.88%
SG&A decline while Technology grows. Seth Klarman sees potential cost advantage or a risk if it hurts future growth.