205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
17.79%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 1.55%. Joel Greenblatt would verify if operating margins keep pace with this top-line surge.
39.45%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 1.82%. Joel Greenblatt would check if cost advantages or brand equity drive this surge.
272.17%
EBIT growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 2.85%. Joel Greenblatt would examine whether a unique competitive edge supports this outperformance.
3330.00%
Operating income growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 6.19%. Joel Greenblatt would see if unique processes drive exceptional profitability.
1429.41%
Net income growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 1.63%. Joel Greenblatt would check if brand strength or cost advantages fuel this outperformance.
2000.00%
EPS growth of 2000.00% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
1900.00%
Diluted EPS growth of 1900.00% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could improve over time.
-0.63%
Share reduction while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a relative advantage if others are diluting.
-0.39%
Diluted share reduction while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if others are still diluting.
-0.80%
Dividend cuts while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others maintain or grow payouts, highlighting a relative weakness.
121.91%
OCF growth of 121.91% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest positive difference, which can compound over time.
144.71%
FCF growth of 144.71% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
29.78%
10Y CAGR of 29.78% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that can compound over very long horizons.
5.55%
5Y CAGR of 5.55% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight improvement that could compound if momentum builds.
-18.54%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would examine if the sector is otherwise stable, indicating a company-specific issue.
128.04%
OCF/share CAGR of 128.04% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest edge that can add up if momentum improves.
53.26%
OCF/share CAGR of 53.26% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that can compound if momentum builds.
6.84%
3Y OCF/share growth of 6.84% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that could compound if momentum holds.
-0.33%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR vs. Technology median of 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a fundamental problem if peers maintain growth.
-17.92%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a specific weakness if peers maintain profitable expansions.
-86.65%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a pressing concern if the rest of the sector is stable or growing.
73.41%
Equity/share CAGR of 73.41% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage in net worth accumulation that could matter long term.
3.13%
5Y equity/share CAGR of 3.13% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight positive that might compound if management executes well.
-11.69%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a short-term weakness if peers still expand net worth.
417.19%
Dividend/share CAGR of 417.19% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a minor improvement that could compound if the firm maintains consistent raises.
423.04%
5Y dividend/share CAGR of 423.04% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees at least some improvement that could compound over time.
262.50%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 262.50% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if the firm is at least inching up payouts.
10.58%
AR growth of 10.58% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if the difference points to new credit strategy or stronger sales push.
-3.19%
Decreasing inventory while Technology is rising. Seth Klarman might see an efficiency advantage or possibly a sign of weaker sales future.
-0.09%
Assets shrink while Technology median grows. Seth Klarman might see a strategic refocus or potential missed expansion if demand is present.
0.66%
BV/share growth of 0.66% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight lead that can expand if sustained over time.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-4.40%
R&D dropping while Technology median is rising. Seth Klarman wonders if we risk ceding future innovation or if peers overspend.
7.21%
SG&A growth of 7.21% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a modest overhead increase needing revenue justification.