205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
9.08%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 5.72%. Joel Greenblatt would verify if operating margins keep pace with this top-line surge.
12.14%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 6.34%. Joel Greenblatt would check if cost advantages or brand equity drive this surge.
15.73%
EBIT growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 10.12%. Joel Greenblatt would examine whether a unique competitive edge supports this outperformance.
16.53%
Operating income growth near Technology median of 15.46%. Charlie Munger might chalk it up to standard industry trends.
16.87%
Net income growth 1.25-1.5x Technology median of 13.87%. Mohnish Pabrai would confirm consistent strategy or niche leadership behind these results.
18.87%
EPS growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 11.91%. Joel Greenblatt would confirm if consistent earnings expansion underpins these gains.
19.23%
Diluted EPS growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 11.61%. Joel Greenblatt would confirm if strong net income growth or buybacks drive outperformance.
-2.03%
Share reduction while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a relative advantage if others are diluting.
-2.01%
Diluted share reduction while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if others are still diluting.
0.70%
Dividend growth of 0.70% while Technology median is flat. Walter Schloss might appreciate at least a modest improvement.
-20.85%
Negative OCF growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would ask if accounting or macro issues hamper the firm specifically.
-43.18%
Negative FCF growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others in the industry are still generating positive expansions in free cash.
74.35%
10Y CAGR of 74.35% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that can compound over very long horizons.
45.91%
5Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 0.73%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company’s moat drives rapid mid-term expansion.
21.46%
3Y CAGR of 21.46% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest improvement overshadowing the broader sector’s stagnation.
24.50%
OCF/share CAGR of 24.50% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest edge that can add up if momentum improves.
-8.14%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a firm-specific issue if peers still expand cash flow.
-25.55%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check whether it’s cyclical or a firm-specific problem.
-15.87%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR vs. Technology median of 11.01%. Seth Klarman might see a fundamental problem if peers maintain growth.
65.53%
5Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 11.84%. Joel Greenblatt might see superior mid-term capital allocation or product strength.
49.96%
3Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 8.44%. Joel Greenblatt might see a recent surge from market share gains or cost synergy.
9.16%
Equity/share CAGR of 9.16% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage in net worth accumulation that could matter long term.
15.04%
5Y equity/share CAGR of 15.04% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight positive that might compound if management executes well.
0.96%
3Y equity/share CAGR of 0.96% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a modest short-term advantage that could compound if momentum persists.
513.01%
Dividend/share CAGR of 513.01% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a minor improvement that could compound if the firm maintains consistent raises.
384.68%
5Y dividend/share CAGR of 384.68% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees at least some improvement that could compound over time.
52.06%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 52.06% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if the firm is at least inching up payouts.
12.39%
AR growth of 12.39% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if the difference points to new credit strategy or stronger sales push.
5.72%
Inventory growth of 5.72% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if we’re preparing for a sales push or risking overstock.
-1.67%
Assets shrink while Technology median grows. Seth Klarman might see a strategic refocus or potential missed expansion if demand is present.
1.55%
BV/share growth of 1.55% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight lead that can expand if sustained over time.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
5.95%
R&D growth of 5.95% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss wonders if a slight increase yields a meaningful competitive edge.
5.29%
SG&A growth of 5.29% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a modest overhead increase needing revenue justification.