PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-3.77%
Negative revenue growth while Technology median is -0.13%. Seth Klarman would investigate if the company is losing market share or facing a declining industry.
-7.59%
Negative gross profit growth while Technology median is -0.40%. Seth Klarman would suspect poor product pricing or inefficient production.
-25.49%
Negative EBIT growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check if external or internal factors caused the decline.
-26.18%
Negative operating income growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check if structural or cyclical issues are at play.
-29.30%
Negative net income growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate factors dragging net income down.
-29.11%
Negative EPS growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would explore whether share dilution or profit declines are to blame.
-28.57%
Negative diluted EPS growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would look for the cause: weakened profitability or heavier share issuance.
-0.43%
Share reduction while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a relative advantage if others are diluting.
0.42%
Diluted share change of 0.42% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight difference in equity issuance policy.
0.43%
Dividend growth of 0.43% while Technology median is flat. Walter Schloss might appreciate at least a modest improvement.
-58.05%
Negative OCF growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would ask if accounting or macro issues hamper the firm specifically.
-65.34%
Negative FCF growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others in the industry are still generating positive expansions in free cash.
103.42%
10Y revenue/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 9.52%. Joel Greenblatt would verify if a unique moat or brand fosters outperformance over a decade.
38.18%
5Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 12.45%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company’s moat drives rapid mid-term expansion.
17.88%
3Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 8.40%. Joel Greenblatt might see a short-term competitive advantage at play.
557.38%
OCF/share CAGR of 557.38% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest edge that can add up if momentum improves.
25.82%
OCF/share CAGR of 25.82% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that can compound if momentum builds.
-8.46%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check whether it’s cyclical or a firm-specific problem.
339.00%
Net income/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 65.47% over a decade. Joel Greenblatt might see a standout compounder of earnings.
54.62%
5Y net income/share CAGR near Technology median. Charlie Munger might see standard mid-cycle performance in a healthy sector.
14.40%
Below 50% of Technology median. Jim Chanos might see a red flag indicating fundamental short-term issues in profitability or cost control.
23.29%
Equity/share CAGR of 23.29% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage in net worth accumulation that could matter long term.
27.79%
5Y equity/share CAGR of 27.79% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight positive that might compound if management executes well.
21.98%
3Y equity/share CAGR of 21.98% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a modest short-term advantage that could compound if momentum persists.
526.91%
Dividend/share CAGR of 526.91% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a minor improvement that could compound if the firm maintains consistent raises.
332.92%
5Y dividend/share CAGR of 332.92% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees at least some improvement that could compound over time.
30.81%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 30.81% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if the firm is at least inching up payouts.
3.29%
AR growth of 3.29% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if the difference points to new credit strategy or stronger sales push.
10.39%
Inventory growth of 10.39% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if we’re preparing for a sales push or risking overstock.
-0.68%
Assets shrink while Technology median grows. Seth Klarman might see a strategic refocus or potential missed expansion if demand is present.
1.75%
BV/share growth of 1.75% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight lead that can expand if sustained over time.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
7.65%
R&D growth of 7.65% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss wonders if a slight increase yields a meaningful competitive edge.
1.54%
SG&A growth of 1.54% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a modest overhead increase needing revenue justification.