PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
0.23%
Revenue growth of 0.23% vs. zero growth in Technology. Walter Schloss might still want to see if it can translate into profits.
-0.51%
Negative gross profit growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect poor product pricing or inefficient production.
-13.11%
Negative EBIT growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check if external or internal factors caused the decline.
-10.06%
Negative operating income growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check if structural or cyclical issues are at play.
-10.57%
Negative net income growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate factors dragging net income down.
-8.77%
Negative EPS growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would explore whether share dilution or profit declines are to blame.
-8.93%
Negative diluted EPS growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would look for the cause: weakened profitability or heavier share issuance.
-1.04%
Share reduction while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a relative advantage if others are diluting.
-1.95%
Diluted share reduction while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if others are still diluting.
-0.30%
Dividend cuts while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others maintain or grow payouts, highlighting a relative weakness.
80.35%
OCF growth of 80.35% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest positive difference, which can compound over time.
166.20%
FCF growth of 166.20% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
173.88%
10Y revenue/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 12.57%. Joel Greenblatt would verify if a unique moat or brand fosters outperformance over a decade.
21.32%
5Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 8.96%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company’s moat drives rapid mid-term expansion.
16.64%
3Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 5.95%. Joel Greenblatt might see a short-term competitive advantage at play.
397.80%
OCF/share CAGR of 397.80% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest edge that can add up if momentum improves.
257.54%
OCF/share CAGR of 257.54% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that can compound if momentum builds.
23.30%
3Y OCF/share growth of 23.30% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that could compound if momentum holds.
850.50%
Net income/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 90.53% over a decade. Joel Greenblatt might see a standout compounder of earnings.
12.70%
Below 50% of Technology median. Jim Chanos would suspect deeper problems limiting mid-term profit potential.
21.68%
Below 50% of Technology median. Jim Chanos might see a red flag indicating fundamental short-term issues in profitability or cost control.
39.50%
Equity/share CAGR of 39.50% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage in net worth accumulation that could matter long term.
20.69%
5Y equity/share CAGR of 20.69% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight positive that might compound if management executes well.
24.51%
3Y equity/share CAGR of 24.51% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a modest short-term advantage that could compound if momentum persists.
484.42%
Dividend/share CAGR of 484.42% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a minor improvement that could compound if the firm maintains consistent raises.
323.55%
5Y dividend/share CAGR of 323.55% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees at least some improvement that could compound over time.
28.78%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 28.78% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if the firm is at least inching up payouts.
6.70%
AR growth of 6.70% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if the difference points to new credit strategy or stronger sales push.
11.52%
Inventory growth of 11.52% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if we’re preparing for a sales push or risking overstock.
22.28%
Asset growth of 22.28% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if expansions yield good returns on capital.
2.19%
BV/share growth of 2.19% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight lead that can expand if sustained over time.
65.84%
Debt growth of 65.84% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest difference that matters if interest coverage is tight.
-6.84%
R&D dropping while Technology median is rising. Seth Klarman wonders if we risk ceding future innovation or if peers overspend.
-5.60%
SG&A decline while Technology grows. Seth Klarman sees potential cost advantage or a risk if it hurts future growth.