PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-8.74%
Negative revenue growth while Technology median is -2.09%. Seth Klarman would investigate if the company is losing market share or facing a declining industry.
-1.10%
Negative gross profit growth while Technology median is -1.48%. Seth Klarman would suspect poor product pricing or inefficient production.
3.79%
EBIT growth of 3.79% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss would see a marginal edge that could be expanded upon.
8.77%
Positive operating income growth while Technology is negative. Peter Lynch would spot a big relative advantage here.
-11.07%
Negative net income growth while Technology median is -2.76%. Seth Klarman would investigate factors dragging net income down.
-11.54%
Negative EPS growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would explore whether share dilution or profit declines are to blame.
-15.38%
Negative diluted EPS growth while Technology median is -0.09%. Seth Klarman would look for the cause: weakened profitability or heavier share issuance.
0.62%
Share change of 0.62% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss would see if the modest difference matters long-term.
1.04%
Diluted share change of 1.04% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight difference in equity issuance policy.
0.42%
Dividend growth of 0.42% while Technology median is flat. Walter Schloss might appreciate at least a modest improvement.
-53.76%
Negative OCF growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would ask if accounting or macro issues hamper the firm specifically.
-57.70%
Negative FCF growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others in the industry are still generating positive expansions in free cash.
183.96%
10Y revenue/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 19.79%. Joel Greenblatt would verify if a unique moat or brand fosters outperformance over a decade.
23.39%
5Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 10.91%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company’s moat drives rapid mid-term expansion.
66.90%
3Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 15.14%. Joel Greenblatt might see a short-term competitive advantage at play.
152.15%
OCF/share CAGR of 152.15% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest edge that can add up if momentum improves.
2.25%
OCF/share CAGR of 2.25% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that can compound if momentum builds.
99.54%
3Y OCF/share growth of 99.54% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that could compound if momentum holds.
1259.23%
Net income/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 71.76% over a decade. Joel Greenblatt might see a standout compounder of earnings.
-35.21%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Technology median is 37.34%. Seth Klarman might see a specific weakness if peers maintain profitable expansions.
1638.85%
3Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 57.31%. Joel Greenblatt might see a recent surge from market share gains or cost synergy.
55.33%
Equity/share CAGR of 55.33% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage in net worth accumulation that could matter long term.
23.79%
5Y equity/share CAGR of 23.79% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight positive that might compound if management executes well.
34.09%
3Y equity/share CAGR of 34.09% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a modest short-term advantage that could compound if momentum persists.
776.07%
Dividend/share CAGR of 776.07% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a minor improvement that could compound if the firm maintains consistent raises.
324.16%
5Y dividend/share CAGR of 324.16% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees at least some improvement that could compound over time.
54.27%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 54.27% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if the firm is at least inching up payouts.
-4.34%
AR shrinking while Technology median grows. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage unless it signals declining demand.
3.64%
Inventory growth of 3.64% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if we’re preparing for a sales push or risking overstock.
-2.38%
Assets shrink while Technology median grows. Seth Klarman might see a strategic refocus or potential missed expansion if demand is present.
0.47%
BV/share growth of 0.47% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight lead that can expand if sustained over time.
-5.49%
Debt is shrinking while Technology median is rising. Seth Klarman might see an advantage if growth remains possible.
7.38%
R&D growth of 7.38% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss wonders if a slight increase yields a meaningful competitive edge.
4.05%
SG&A growth of 4.05% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a modest overhead increase needing revenue justification.