205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
1.65%
Revenue growth of 1.65% vs. zero growth in Technology. Walter Schloss might still want to see if it can translate into profits.
5.39%
Gross profit growth of 5.39% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that could be built upon.
44.97%
EBIT growth of 44.97% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss would see a marginal edge that could be expanded upon.
40.47%
Operating income growth of 40.47% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that can expand.
75.78%
Net income growth of 75.78% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see potential if moderate gains can keep rising.
78.95%
EPS growth of 78.95% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
76.32%
Diluted EPS growth of 76.32% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could improve over time.
-0.88%
Share reduction while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a relative advantage if others are diluting.
-1.13%
Diluted share reduction while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if others are still diluting.
0.37%
Dividend growth of 0.37% while Technology median is flat. Walter Schloss might appreciate at least a modest improvement.
78.07%
OCF growth of 78.07% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest positive difference, which can compound over time.
98.87%
FCF growth of 98.87% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
128.08%
10Y revenue/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 11.55%. Joel Greenblatt would verify if a unique moat or brand fosters outperformance over a decade.
16.05%
5Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 5.57%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company’s moat drives rapid mid-term expansion.
30.73%
3Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 10.20%. Joel Greenblatt might see a short-term competitive advantage at play.
221.77%
OCF/share CAGR of 221.77% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest edge that can add up if momentum improves.
-1.55%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a firm-specific issue if peers still expand cash flow.
60.07%
3Y OCF/share growth of 60.07% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that could compound if momentum holds.
530.73%
Net income/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 76.53% over a decade. Joel Greenblatt might see a standout compounder of earnings.
26.69%
5Y net income/share CAGR near Technology median. Charlie Munger might see standard mid-cycle performance in a healthy sector.
61.84%
3Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 32.89%. Joel Greenblatt might see a recent surge from market share gains or cost synergy.
55.49%
Equity/share CAGR of 55.49% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage in net worth accumulation that could matter long term.
28.39%
5Y equity/share CAGR of 28.39% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight positive that might compound if management executes well.
34.19%
3Y equity/share CAGR of 34.19% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a modest short-term advantage that could compound if momentum persists.
707.91%
Dividend/share CAGR of 707.91% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a minor improvement that could compound if the firm maintains consistent raises.
113.40%
5Y dividend/share CAGR of 113.40% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees at least some improvement that could compound over time.
56.13%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 56.13% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if the firm is at least inching up payouts.
-0.37%
AR shrinking while Technology median grows. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage unless it signals declining demand.
-1.96%
Decreasing inventory while Technology is rising. Seth Klarman might see an efficiency advantage or possibly a sign of weaker sales future.
5.09%
Asset growth of 5.09% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if expansions yield good returns on capital.
3.10%
BV/share growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median. Joel Greenblatt checks if consistent ROE or undervalued buybacks fuel this advantage.
20.99%
Debt growth of 20.99% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest difference that matters if interest coverage is tight.
-3.54%
R&D dropping while Technology median is rising. Seth Klarman wonders if we risk ceding future innovation or if peers overspend.
-0.66%
SG&A decline while Technology grows. Seth Klarman sees potential cost advantage or a risk if it hurts future growth.