205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-12.12%
Negative revenue growth while Technology median is 2.08%. Seth Klarman would investigate if the company is losing market share or facing a declining industry.
-16.95%
Negative gross profit growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect poor product pricing or inefficient production.
-79.40%
Negative EBIT growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check if external or internal factors caused the decline.
-83.45%
Negative operating income growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check if structural or cyclical issues are at play.
-66.33%
Negative net income growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate factors dragging net income down.
-66.18%
Negative EPS growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would explore whether share dilution or profit declines are to blame.
-65.67%
Negative diluted EPS growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would look for the cause: weakened profitability or heavier share issuance.
-1.50%
Share reduction while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a relative advantage if others are diluting.
-1.49%
Diluted share reduction while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if others are still diluting.
22.98%
Dividend growth of 22.98% while Technology median is flat. Walter Schloss might appreciate at least a modest improvement.
-9.73%
Negative OCF growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would ask if accounting or macro issues hamper the firm specifically.
-5.99%
Negative FCF growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others in the industry are still generating positive expansions in free cash.
103.30%
10Y revenue/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 9.63%. Joel Greenblatt would verify if a unique moat or brand fosters outperformance over a decade.
3.27%
5Y CAGR of 3.27% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight improvement that could compound if momentum builds.
10.62%
3Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 3.93%. Joel Greenblatt might see a short-term competitive advantage at play.
113.57%
OCF/share CAGR of 113.57% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest edge that can add up if momentum improves.
-6.01%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a firm-specific issue if peers still expand cash flow.
20.95%
3Y OCF/share growth of 20.95% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that could compound if momentum holds.
165.64%
Net income/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 31.69% over a decade. Joel Greenblatt might see a standout compounder of earnings.
-56.90%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a specific weakness if peers maintain profitable expansions.
-55.02%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a pressing concern if the rest of the sector is stable or growing.
49.55%
Equity/share CAGR of 49.55% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage in net worth accumulation that could matter long term.
35.46%
5Y equity/share CAGR of 35.46% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight positive that might compound if management executes well.
25.81%
3Y equity/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 5.86%. Joel Greenblatt sees strong short-term returns on equity fueling net worth growth.
856.00%
Dividend/share CAGR of 856.00% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a minor improvement that could compound if the firm maintains consistent raises.
109.92%
5Y dividend/share CAGR of 109.92% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees at least some improvement that could compound over time.
76.00%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 76.00% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if the firm is at least inching up payouts.
-24.21%
AR shrinking while Technology median grows. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage unless it signals declining demand.
-4.92%
Decreasing inventory while Technology is rising. Seth Klarman might see an efficiency advantage or possibly a sign of weaker sales future.
-2.19%
Assets shrink while Technology median grows. Seth Klarman might see a strategic refocus or potential missed expansion if demand is present.
-2.41%
Negative BV/share change while Technology median is 0.12%. Seth Klarman sees a firm-specific weakness if peers accumulate net worth.
-0.07%
Debt is shrinking while Technology median is rising. Seth Klarman might see an advantage if growth remains possible.
-8.21%
R&D dropping while Technology median is rising. Seth Klarman wonders if we risk ceding future innovation or if peers overspend.
-5.08%
SG&A decline while Technology grows. Seth Klarman sees potential cost advantage or a risk if it hurts future growth.