PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-3.16%
Negative revenue growth while Technology median is -3.16%. Seth Klarman would investigate if the company is losing market share or facing a declining industry.
-4.91%
Negative gross profit growth while Technology median is -2.39%. Seth Klarman would suspect poor product pricing or inefficient production.
133.15%
Positive EBIT growth while Technology median is negative. Peter Lynch might see a strong competitive advantage in operations.
184.17%
Positive operating income growth while Technology is negative. Peter Lynch would spot a big relative advantage here.
37.12%
Positive net income growth while Technology median is negative. Peter Lynch would view this as a notable competitive advantage.
39.13%
Positive EPS growth while Technology median is negative. Peter Lynch might see a strong advantage in per-share earnings compared to peers.
39.13%
Positive diluted EPS growth while Technology median is negative. Peter Lynch might see a real advantage in how this firm manages share count or drives net income.
-0.54%
Share reduction while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a relative advantage if others are diluting.
-0.09%
Diluted share reduction while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if others are still diluting.
-0.74%
Dividend cuts while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others maintain or grow payouts, highlighting a relative weakness.
-66.82%
Negative OCF growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would ask if accounting or macro issues hamper the firm specifically.
-72.09%
Negative FCF growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others in the industry are still generating positive expansions in free cash.
98.72%
10Y revenue/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 10.10%. Joel Greenblatt would verify if a unique moat or brand fosters outperformance over a decade.
5.70%
5Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 3.53%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company’s moat drives rapid mid-term expansion.
0.26%
3Y revenue/share growth below 50% of Technology median of 5.30%. Jim Chanos would suspect a significant short-term erosion in competitiveness.
177.32%
OCF/share CAGR of 177.32% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest edge that can add up if momentum improves.
-32.68%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a firm-specific issue if peers still expand cash flow.
-43.52%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check whether it’s cyclical or a firm-specific problem.
367.16%
Net income/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 37.32% over a decade. Joel Greenblatt might see a standout compounder of earnings.
-34.45%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Technology median is 9.03%. Seth Klarman might see a specific weakness if peers maintain profitable expansions.
-38.72%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a pressing concern if the rest of the sector is stable or growing.
54.13%
Equity/share CAGR of 54.13% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage in net worth accumulation that could matter long term.
33.19%
5Y equity/share CAGR of 33.19% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight positive that might compound if management executes well.
24.41%
3Y equity/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 4.42%. Joel Greenblatt sees strong short-term returns on equity fueling net worth growth.
846.73%
Dividend/share CAGR of 846.73% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a minor improvement that could compound if the firm maintains consistent raises.
109.10%
5Y dividend/share CAGR of 109.10% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees at least some improvement that could compound over time.
73.43%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 73.43% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if the firm is at least inching up payouts.
8.37%
AR growth of 8.37% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if the difference points to new credit strategy or stronger sales push.
-3.24%
Decreasing inventory while Technology is rising. Seth Klarman might see an efficiency advantage or possibly a sign of weaker sales future.
-1.81%
Assets shrink while Technology median grows. Seth Klarman might see a strategic refocus or potential missed expansion if demand is present.
0.46%
BV/share growth of 0.46% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight lead that can expand if sustained over time.
-0.05%
Debt is shrinking while Technology median is rising. Seth Klarman might see an advantage if growth remains possible.
-1.41%
R&D dropping while Technology median is rising. Seth Klarman wonders if we risk ceding future innovation or if peers overspend.
6.74%
SG&A growth of 6.74% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a modest overhead increase needing revenue justification.