205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
5.62%
Revenue growth 1.25-1.5x Technology median of 4.84%. Mohnish Pabrai would see if this gap is sustainable or cyclical.
14.26%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 5.76%. Joel Greenblatt would check if cost advantages or brand equity drive this surge.
51.57%
EBIT growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 4.25%. Joel Greenblatt would examine whether a unique competitive edge supports this outperformance.
129.37%
Operating income growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 10.93%. Joel Greenblatt would see if unique processes drive exceptional profitability.
82.32%
Net income growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 5.97%. Joel Greenblatt would check if brand strength or cost advantages fuel this outperformance.
84.37%
EPS growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 5.56%. Joel Greenblatt would confirm if consistent earnings expansion underpins these gains.
81.25%
Diluted EPS growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 5.60%. Joel Greenblatt would confirm if strong net income growth or buybacks drive outperformance.
-0.36%
Share reduction while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a relative advantage if others are diluting.
-0.53%
Diluted share reduction while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if others are still diluting.
33.67%
Dividend growth of 33.67% while Technology median is flat. Walter Schloss might appreciate at least a modest improvement.
87.22%
OCF growth of 87.22% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest positive difference, which can compound over time.
109.06%
FCF growth of 109.06% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
104.15%
10Y revenue/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 2.39%. Joel Greenblatt would verify if a unique moat or brand fosters outperformance over a decade.
8.82%
5Y CAGR of 8.82% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight improvement that could compound if momentum builds.
-4.55%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Technology median is 3.57%. Seth Klarman would examine if the sector is otherwise stable, indicating a company-specific issue.
179.43%
OCF/share CAGR of 179.43% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest edge that can add up if momentum improves.
55.41%
OCF/share CAGR of 55.41% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that can compound if momentum builds.
31.35%
3Y OCF/share growth of 31.35% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that could compound if momentum holds.
754.81%
Net income/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 8.62% over a decade. Joel Greenblatt might see a standout compounder of earnings.
34.33%
Net income/share CAGR of 34.33% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that can expand mid-term.
-6.00%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a pressing concern if the rest of the sector is stable or growing.
58.52%
Equity/share CAGR of 58.52% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage in net worth accumulation that could matter long term.
32.67%
5Y equity/share CAGR of 32.67% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight positive that might compound if management executes well.
24.26%
3Y equity/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 5.88%. Joel Greenblatt sees strong short-term returns on equity fueling net worth growth.
1208.79%
Dividend/share CAGR of 1208.79% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a minor improvement that could compound if the firm maintains consistent raises.
180.15%
5Y dividend/share CAGR of 180.15% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees at least some improvement that could compound over time.
130.21%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 130.21% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if the firm is at least inching up payouts.
11.85%
AR growth of 11.85% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if the difference points to new credit strategy or stronger sales push.
1.18%
Inventory growth of 1.18% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if we’re preparing for a sales push or risking overstock.
-1.54%
Assets shrink while Technology median grows. Seth Klarman might see a strategic refocus or potential missed expansion if demand is present.
1.43%
BV/share growth of 1.43% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight lead that can expand if sustained over time.
-9.11%
Debt is shrinking while Technology median is rising. Seth Klarman might see an advantage if growth remains possible.
-7.16%
R&D dropping while Technology median is rising. Seth Klarman wonders if we risk ceding future innovation or if peers overspend.
2.61%
SG&A growth far above Technology median. Jim Chanos sees potential red flags in cost management or diminishing returns on spending.