PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
6.47%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 0.10%. Joel Greenblatt would verify if operating margins keep pace with this top-line surge.
13.31%
Gross profit growth of 13.31% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that could be built upon.
37.52%
EBIT growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 2.01%. Joel Greenblatt would examine whether a unique competitive edge supports this outperformance.
-6.84%
Negative operating income growth while Technology median is 2.76%. Seth Klarman would check if structural or cyclical issues are at play.
-4.70%
Negative net income growth while Technology median is 5.40%. Seth Klarman would investigate factors dragging net income down.
-5.08%
Negative EPS growth while Technology median is 4.84%. Seth Klarman would explore whether share dilution or profit declines are to blame.
-3.45%
Negative diluted EPS growth while Technology median is 4.76%. Seth Klarman would look for the cause: weakened profitability or heavier share issuance.
-0.63%
Share reduction while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a relative advantage if others are diluting.
-0.54%
Diluted share reduction while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if others are still diluting.
0.31%
Dividend growth of 0.31% while Technology median is flat. Walter Schloss might appreciate at least a modest improvement.
70.77%
OCF growth of 70.77% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest positive difference, which can compound over time.
77.99%
FCF growth of 77.99% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
100.90%
10Y revenue/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 12.87%. Joel Greenblatt would verify if a unique moat or brand fosters outperformance over a decade.
13.95%
5Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 4.42%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company’s moat drives rapid mid-term expansion.
-6.30%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Technology median is 5.45%. Seth Klarman would examine if the sector is otherwise stable, indicating a company-specific issue.
254.02%
OCF/share CAGR of 254.02% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest edge that can add up if momentum improves.
30.17%
OCF/share CAGR of 30.17% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that can compound if momentum builds.
-5.66%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check whether it’s cyclical or a firm-specific problem.
120.73%
Net income/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 61.57% over a decade. Joel Greenblatt might see a standout compounder of earnings.
32.93%
5Y net income/share CAGR 75-90% of Technology median. John Neff would encourage better profitability or share buybacks to catch up with peers.
-20.90%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Technology median is 1.56%. Seth Klarman might see a pressing concern if the rest of the sector is stable or growing.
51.69%
Equity/share CAGR of 51.69% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage in net worth accumulation that could matter long term.
30.26%
5Y equity/share CAGR of 30.26% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight positive that might compound if management executes well.
19.84%
3Y equity/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 8.10%. Joel Greenblatt sees strong short-term returns on equity fueling net worth growth.
1205.79%
Dividend/share CAGR of 1205.79% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a minor improvement that could compound if the firm maintains consistent raises.
179.73%
5Y dividend/share CAGR of 179.73% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees at least some improvement that could compound over time.
132.68%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 132.68% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if the firm is at least inching up payouts.
2.21%
AR growth of 2.21% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if the difference points to new credit strategy or stronger sales push.
0.35%
Inventory growth of 0.35% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if we’re preparing for a sales push or risking overstock.
-0.79%
Assets shrink while Technology median grows. Seth Klarman might see a strategic refocus or potential missed expansion if demand is present.
0.48%
Below 50% of Technology median. Jim Chanos suspects deeper issues blocking net worth accumulation.
-0.08%
Debt is shrinking while Technology median is rising. Seth Klarman might see an advantage if growth remains possible.
-5.40%
R&D dropping while Technology median is rising. Seth Klarman wonders if we risk ceding future innovation or if peers overspend.
-1.27%
SG&A decline while Technology grows. Seth Klarman sees potential cost advantage or a risk if it hurts future growth.