PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
10.36%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 3.35%. Joel Greenblatt would verify if operating margins keep pace with this top-line surge.
17.05%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 4.63%. Joel Greenblatt would check if cost advantages or brand equity drive this surge.
41.52%
EBIT growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 2.03%. Joel Greenblatt would examine whether a unique competitive edge supports this outperformance.
42.32%
Operating income growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 4.28%. Joel Greenblatt would see if unique processes drive exceptional profitability.
40.25%
Net income growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 2.92%. Joel Greenblatt would check if brand strength or cost advantages fuel this outperformance.
43.18%
EPS growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 3.56%. Joel Greenblatt would confirm if consistent earnings expansion underpins these gains.
40.91%
Diluted EPS growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 2.45%. Joel Greenblatt would confirm if strong net income growth or buybacks drive outperformance.
-0.93%
Share reduction while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a relative advantage if others are diluting.
-0.91%
Diluted share reduction while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if others are still diluting.
0.31%
Dividend growth of 0.31% while Technology median is flat. Walter Schloss might appreciate at least a modest improvement.
67.75%
OCF growth of 67.75% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest positive difference, which can compound over time.
80.52%
FCF growth of 80.52% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
67.30%
10Y revenue/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 9.68%. Joel Greenblatt would verify if a unique moat or brand fosters outperformance over a decade.
58.50%
5Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 15.18%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company’s moat drives rapid mid-term expansion.
2.76%
3Y revenue/share growth below 50% of Technology median of 5.89%. Jim Chanos would suspect a significant short-term erosion in competitiveness.
152.27%
OCF/share CAGR of 152.27% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest edge that can add up if momentum improves.
64.60%
OCF/share CAGR of 64.60% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that can compound if momentum builds.
32.57%
3Y OCF/share growth of 32.57% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that could compound if momentum holds.
155.09%
Net income/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 21.94% over a decade. Joel Greenblatt might see a standout compounder of earnings.
210.77%
5Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 44.89%. Joel Greenblatt might see superior mid-term capital allocation or product strength.
9.70%
3Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 0.88%. Joel Greenblatt might see a recent surge from market share gains or cost synergy.
38.59%
Equity/share CAGR of 38.59% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage in net worth accumulation that could matter long term.
34.39%
5Y equity/share CAGR of 34.39% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight positive that might compound if management executes well.
3.61%
3Y equity/share CAGR 50-75% of Technology median. Guy Spier suspects suboptimal short-term capital usage vs. peers.
1337.84%
Dividend/share CAGR of 1337.84% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a minor improvement that could compound if the firm maintains consistent raises.
174.90%
5Y dividend/share CAGR of 174.90% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees at least some improvement that could compound over time.
132.42%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 132.42% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if the firm is at least inching up payouts.
12.69%
AR growth of 12.69% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if the difference points to new credit strategy or stronger sales push.
1.75%
Inventory growth of 1.75% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if we’re preparing for a sales push or risking overstock.
-5.94%
Assets shrink while Technology median grows. Seth Klarman might see a strategic refocus or potential missed expansion if demand is present.
-0.53%
Negative BV/share change while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a firm-specific weakness if peers accumulate net worth.
-17.76%
Debt is shrinking while Technology median is rising. Seth Klarman might see an advantage if growth remains possible.
-4.64%
R&D dropping while Technology median is rising. Seth Klarman wonders if we risk ceding future innovation or if peers overspend.
-1.46%
SG&A decline while Technology grows. Seth Klarman sees potential cost advantage or a risk if it hurts future growth.