PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-3.64%
Negative revenue growth while Technology median is -2.28%. Seth Klarman would investigate if the company is losing market share or facing a declining industry.
-4.17%
Negative gross profit growth while Technology median is -1.64%. Seth Klarman would suspect poor product pricing or inefficient production.
-13.26%
Negative EBIT growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check if external or internal factors caused the decline.
-12.91%
Negative operating income growth while Technology median is -5.20%. Seth Klarman would check if structural or cyclical issues are at play.
-20.48%
Negative net income growth while Technology median is -4.03%. Seth Klarman would investigate factors dragging net income down.
-19.48%
Negative EPS growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would explore whether share dilution or profit declines are to blame.
-19.74%
Negative diluted EPS growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would look for the cause: weakened profitability or heavier share issuance.
-0.21%
Share reduction while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a relative advantage if others are diluting.
-0.19%
Diluted share reduction while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if others are still diluting.
0.21%
Dividend growth of 0.21% while Technology median is flat. Walter Schloss might appreciate at least a modest improvement.
-52.12%
Negative OCF growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would ask if accounting or macro issues hamper the firm specifically.
-57.63%
Negative FCF growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others in the industry are still generating positive expansions in free cash.
72.62%
10Y revenue/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 22.42%. Joel Greenblatt would verify if a unique moat or brand fosters outperformance over a decade.
16.03%
5Y revenue/share growth near Technology median of 16.85%. Charlie Munger might see typical industry or economic growth patterns.
10.46%
3Y revenue/share growth near Technology median of 10.69%. Charlie Munger would note typical industry expansions over the short term.
89.65%
OCF/share CAGR of 89.65% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest edge that can add up if momentum improves.
1.26%
OCF/share CAGR of 1.26% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that can compound if momentum builds.
48.44%
3Y OCF/share growth of 48.44% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that could compound if momentum holds.
159.95%
Net income/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 39.90% over a decade. Joel Greenblatt might see a standout compounder of earnings.
17.70%
5Y net income/share CAGR 75-90% of Technology median. John Neff would encourage better profitability or share buybacks to catch up with peers.
170.91%
3Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 16.43%. Joel Greenblatt might see a recent surge from market share gains or cost synergy.
41.87%
Equity/share CAGR of 41.87% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage in net worth accumulation that could matter long term.
24.85%
5Y equity/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 16.16%. Joel Greenblatt sees a possible ROE advantage or fewer share issuances boosting book value.
2.50%
Below 50% of Technology median. Jim Chanos worries about inadequate short-term profitability or repeated asset impairments.
1248.38%
Dividend/share CAGR of 1248.38% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a minor improvement that could compound if the firm maintains consistent raises.
182.07%
5Y dividend/share CAGR of 182.07% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees at least some improvement that could compound over time.
99.80%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 99.80% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if the firm is at least inching up payouts.
11.88%
AR growth of 11.88% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if the difference points to new credit strategy or stronger sales push.
3.36%
Inventory growth far above Technology median. Jim Chanos suspects major issues in demand forecasting or potential obsolescence risk.
-2.12%
Assets shrink while Technology median grows. Seth Klarman might see a strategic refocus or potential missed expansion if demand is present.
0.01%
BV/share growth of 0.01% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight lead that can expand if sustained over time.
-0.09%
Debt is shrinking while Technology median is rising. Seth Klarman might see an advantage if growth remains possible.
8.68%
R&D growth of 8.68% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss wonders if a slight increase yields a meaningful competitive edge.
2.33%
SG&A growth of 2.33% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a modest overhead increase needing revenue justification.