PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
2.60%
Revenue growth 1.25-1.5x Technology median of 2.02%. Mohnish Pabrai would see if this gap is sustainable or cyclical.
3.58%
Gross profit growth 1.25-1.5x Technology median of 2.54%. Mohnish Pabrai would see if economies of scale justify the premium growth.
5.30%
EBIT growth of 5.30% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss would see a marginal edge that could be expanded upon.
5.43%
Operating income growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 0.19%. Joel Greenblatt would see if unique processes drive exceptional profitability.
6.10%
Net income growth of 6.10% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see potential if moderate gains can keep rising.
6.45%
EPS growth of 6.45% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
6.56%
Diluted EPS growth of 6.56% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could improve over time.
-0.99%
Share reduction while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a relative advantage if others are diluting.
-0.94%
Diluted share reduction while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if others are still diluting.
0.43%
Dividend growth of 0.43% while Technology median is flat. Walter Schloss might appreciate at least a modest improvement.
34.65%
OCF growth of 34.65% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest positive difference, which can compound over time.
43.00%
FCF growth of 43.00% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
57.57%
10Y revenue/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 11.36%. Joel Greenblatt would verify if a unique moat or brand fosters outperformance over a decade.
7.99%
5Y revenue/share growth 50-75% of Technology median of 13.08%. Guy Spier might worry about slower mid-term expansions vs. peers.
6.84%
3Y revenue/share growth 75-90% of Technology median of 8.63%. John Neff would see if operational improvements can catch up with peers.
56.58%
OCF/share CAGR of 56.58% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest edge that can add up if momentum improves.
70.44%
OCF/share CAGR of 70.44% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that can compound if momentum builds.
33.92%
3Y OCF/share growth of 33.92% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that could compound if momentum holds.
75.01%
Net income/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 12.88% over a decade. Joel Greenblatt might see a standout compounder of earnings.
5.73%
5Y net income/share CAGR 75-90% of Technology median. John Neff would encourage better profitability or share buybacks to catch up with peers.
72.03%
3Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 12.84%. Joel Greenblatt might see a recent surge from market share gains or cost synergy.
40.58%
Equity/share CAGR of 40.58% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage in net worth accumulation that could matter long term.
22.21%
5Y equity/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 7.02%. Joel Greenblatt sees a possible ROE advantage or fewer share issuances boosting book value.
0.82%
Below 50% of Technology median. Jim Chanos worries about inadequate short-term profitability or repeated asset impairments.
1263.46%
Dividend/share CAGR of 1263.46% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a minor improvement that could compound if the firm maintains consistent raises.
181.31%
5Y dividend/share CAGR of 181.31% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees at least some improvement that could compound over time.
100.13%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 100.13% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if the firm is at least inching up payouts.
2.87%
AR growth of 2.87% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if the difference points to new credit strategy or stronger sales push.
2.22%
Inventory growth of 2.22% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if we’re preparing for a sales push or risking overstock.
1.07%
Asset growth of 1.07% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if expansions yield good returns on capital.
-0.60%
Negative BV/share change while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a firm-specific weakness if peers accumulate net worth.
5.30%
Debt growth of 5.30% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest difference that matters if interest coverage is tight.
-5.33%
R&D dropping while Technology median is rising. Seth Klarman wonders if we risk ceding future innovation or if peers overspend.
7.06%
SG&A growth of 7.06% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a modest overhead increase needing revenue justification.