PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-7.00%
Negative revenue growth while Technology median is 2.06%. Seth Klarman would investigate if the company is losing market share or facing a declining industry.
-6.56%
Negative gross profit growth while Technology median is 0.70%. Seth Klarman would suspect poor product pricing or inefficient production.
-0.77%
Negative EBIT growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check if external or internal factors caused the decline.
-1.89%
Negative operating income growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check if structural or cyclical issues are at play.
4.76%
Net income growth of 4.76% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see potential if moderate gains can keep rising.
3.90%
EPS growth of 3.90% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
5.26%
Diluted EPS growth of 5.26% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could improve over time.
-0.82%
Share reduction while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a relative advantage if others are diluting.
-0.77%
Diluted share reduction while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if others are still diluting.
11.84%
Dividend growth of 11.84% while Technology median is flat. Walter Schloss might appreciate at least a modest improvement.
1.49%
OCF growth of 1.49% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest positive difference, which can compound over time.
-0.31%
Negative FCF growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others in the industry are still generating positive expansions in free cash.
40.82%
10Y revenue/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 17.29%. Joel Greenblatt would verify if a unique moat or brand fosters outperformance over a decade.
4.85%
5Y revenue/share growth 50-75% of Technology median of 8.90%. Guy Spier might worry about slower mid-term expansions vs. peers.
17.82%
3Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 10.03%. Joel Greenblatt might see a short-term competitive advantage at play.
149.80%
OCF/share CAGR of 149.80% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest edge that can add up if momentum improves.
34.74%
OCF/share CAGR of 34.74% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that can compound if momentum builds.
45.06%
3Y OCF/share growth of 45.06% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that could compound if momentum holds.
102.44%
Net income/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 11.87% over a decade. Joel Greenblatt might see a standout compounder of earnings.
2.85%
Net income/share CAGR of 2.85% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that can expand mid-term.
248.52%
3Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 5.85%. Joel Greenblatt might see a recent surge from market share gains or cost synergy.
32.16%
Equity/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 2.07% over 10 years. Joel Greenblatt would see if a high ROE underlies this compounding advantage.
10.44%
5Y equity/share CAGR near Technology median. Charlie Munger finds it normal mid-term expansion for the industry.
-0.13%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while Technology median is 10.06%. Seth Klarman sees a short-term weakness if peers still expand net worth.
1175.51%
Dividend/share CAGR of 1175.51% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a minor improvement that could compound if the firm maintains consistent raises.
192.39%
5Y dividend/share CAGR of 192.39% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees at least some improvement that could compound over time.
80.78%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 80.78% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if the firm is at least inching up payouts.
-21.34%
AR shrinking while Technology median grows. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage unless it signals declining demand.
-4.52%
Decreasing inventory while Technology is rising. Seth Klarman might see an efficiency advantage or possibly a sign of weaker sales future.
-1.87%
Assets shrink while Technology median grows. Seth Klarman might see a strategic refocus or potential missed expansion if demand is present.
0.58%
BV/share growth of 0.58% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight lead that can expand if sustained over time.
-0.29%
Debt is shrinking while Technology median is rising. Seth Klarman might see an advantage if growth remains possible.
-3.16%
R&D dropping while Technology median is rising. Seth Klarman wonders if we risk ceding future innovation or if peers overspend.
-6.68%
SG&A decline while Technology grows. Seth Klarman sees potential cost advantage or a risk if it hurts future growth.