PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
8.81%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 3.32%. Joel Greenblatt would verify if operating margins keep pace with this top-line surge.
9.81%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 3.74%. Joel Greenblatt would check if cost advantages or brand equity drive this surge.
15.53%
EBIT growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 3.96%. Joel Greenblatt would examine whether a unique competitive edge supports this outperformance.
15.39%
Operating income growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 6.21%. Joel Greenblatt would see if unique processes drive exceptional profitability.
15.19%
Net income growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 7.45%. Joel Greenblatt would check if brand strength or cost advantages fuel this outperformance.
15.71%
EPS growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 7.51%. Joel Greenblatt would confirm if consistent earnings expansion underpins these gains.
14.49%
Diluted EPS growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 7.92%. Joel Greenblatt would confirm if strong net income growth or buybacks drive outperformance.
-0.32%
Share reduction while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a relative advantage if others are diluting.
-0.20%
Diluted share reduction while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if others are still diluting.
0.06%
Dividend growth of 0.06% while Technology median is flat. Walter Schloss might appreciate at least a modest improvement.
95.43%
OCF growth of 95.43% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest positive difference, which can compound over time.
115.37%
FCF growth of 115.37% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
37.03%
10Y revenue/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 10.45%. Joel Greenblatt would verify if a unique moat or brand fosters outperformance over a decade.
9.05%
5Y revenue/share growth 75-90% of Technology median of 10.73%. John Neff would expect a plan to align with peers or surpass them.
18.09%
3Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 8.37%. Joel Greenblatt might see a short-term competitive advantage at play.
158.94%
OCF/share CAGR of 158.94% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest edge that can add up if momentum improves.
95.19%
OCF/share CAGR of 95.19% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that can compound if momentum builds.
74.36%
3Y OCF/share growth of 74.36% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that could compound if momentum holds.
-46.89%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR vs. Technology median of 5.40%. Seth Klarman might see a fundamental problem if peers maintain growth.
40.42%
5Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 0.31%. Joel Greenblatt might see superior mid-term capital allocation or product strength.
36.42%
3Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 13.88%. Joel Greenblatt might see a recent surge from market share gains or cost synergy.
20.58%
Equity/share CAGR of 20.58% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage in net worth accumulation that could matter long term.
5.27%
5Y equity/share CAGR of 5.27% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight positive that might compound if management executes well.
-1.05%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while Technology median is 4.46%. Seth Klarman sees a short-term weakness if peers still expand net worth.
1158.01%
Dividend/share CAGR of 1158.01% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a minor improvement that could compound if the firm maintains consistent raises.
193.41%
5Y dividend/share CAGR of 193.41% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees at least some improvement that could compound over time.
35.90%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 35.90% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if the firm is at least inching up payouts.
6.23%
AR growth of 6.23% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if the difference points to new credit strategy or stronger sales push.
3.93%
Inventory growth of 3.93% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if we’re preparing for a sales push or risking overstock.
0.04%
Asset growth of 0.04% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if expansions yield good returns on capital.
2.17%
BV/share growth of 2.17% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight lead that can expand if sustained over time.
-12.29%
Debt is shrinking while Technology median is rising. Seth Klarman might see an advantage if growth remains possible.
5.90%
R&D growth of 5.90% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss wonders if a slight increase yields a meaningful competitive edge.
2.95%
SG&A growth of 2.95% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a modest overhead increase needing revenue justification.