PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
12.28%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 0.95%. Joel Greenblatt would verify if operating margins keep pace with this top-line surge.
13.83%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 1.22%. Joel Greenblatt would check if cost advantages or brand equity drive this surge.
24.58%
EBIT growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 2.96%. Joel Greenblatt would examine whether a unique competitive edge supports this outperformance.
24.89%
Operating income growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 2.43%. Joel Greenblatt would see if unique processes drive exceptional profitability.
18.19%
Net income growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 4.22%. Joel Greenblatt would check if brand strength or cost advantages fuel this outperformance.
23.46%
EPS growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 3.82%. Joel Greenblatt would confirm if consistent earnings expansion underpins these gains.
24.05%
Diluted EPS growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 3.82%. Joel Greenblatt would confirm if strong net income growth or buybacks drive outperformance.
-0.22%
Share reduction while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a relative advantage if others are diluting.
0.10%
Diluted share change of 0.10% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight difference in equity issuance policy.
0.22%
Dividend growth of 0.22% while Technology median is flat. Walter Schloss might appreciate at least a modest improvement.
32.18%
OCF growth of 32.18% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest positive difference, which can compound over time.
39.85%
FCF growth of 39.85% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
46.99%
10Y revenue/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 21.68%. Joel Greenblatt would verify if a unique moat or brand fosters outperformance over a decade.
21.16%
5Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 13.84%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company’s moat drives rapid mid-term expansion.
24.02%
3Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 9.98%. Joel Greenblatt might see a short-term competitive advantage at play.
407.30%
OCF/share CAGR of 407.30% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest edge that can add up if momentum improves.
41.89%
OCF/share CAGR of 41.89% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that can compound if momentum builds.
34.40%
3Y OCF/share growth of 34.40% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that could compound if momentum holds.
107.43%
Net income/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 45.35% over a decade. Joel Greenblatt might see a standout compounder of earnings.
84.05%
5Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 18.94%. Joel Greenblatt might see superior mid-term capital allocation or product strength.
68.48%
3Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 16.12%. Joel Greenblatt might see a recent surge from market share gains or cost synergy.
28.66%
Equity/share CAGR of 28.66% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage in net worth accumulation that could matter long term.
6.60%
5Y equity/share CAGR 50-75% of Technology median. Guy Spier sees subpar net worth creation vs. competitors.
1.90%
Below 50% of Technology median. Jim Chanos worries about inadequate short-term profitability or repeated asset impairments.
1149.23%
Dividend/share CAGR of 1149.23% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a minor improvement that could compound if the firm maintains consistent raises.
194.94%
5Y dividend/share CAGR of 194.94% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees at least some improvement that could compound over time.
35.78%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 35.78% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if the firm is at least inching up payouts.
7.34%
AR growth of 7.34% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if the difference points to new credit strategy or stronger sales push.
-3.62%
Decreasing inventory while Technology is rising. Seth Klarman might see an efficiency advantage or possibly a sign of weaker sales future.
3.33%
Asset growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 0.97%. Joel Greenblatt confirms strong expansions matched by adequate returns on those assets.
3.48%
BV/share growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median. Joel Greenblatt checks if consistent ROE or undervalued buybacks fuel this advantage.
-0.03%
Debt is shrinking while Technology median is rising. Seth Klarman might see an advantage if growth remains possible.
3.52%
R&D growth of 3.52% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss wonders if a slight increase yields a meaningful competitive edge.
-2.64%
SG&A decline while Technology grows. Seth Klarman sees potential cost advantage or a risk if it hurts future growth.