PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-7.10%
Negative revenue growth while Technology median is 3.39%. Seth Klarman would investigate if the company is losing market share or facing a declining industry.
-6.45%
Negative gross profit growth while Technology median is 2.61%. Seth Klarman would suspect poor product pricing or inefficient production.
8.36%
EBIT growth of 8.36% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss would see a marginal edge that could be expanded upon.
-5.45%
Negative operating income growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check if structural or cyclical issues are at play.
8.16%
Net income growth of 8.16% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see potential if moderate gains can keep rising.
4.00%
EPS growth of 4.00% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
4.08%
Diluted EPS growth of 4.08% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could improve over time.
-0.51%
Share reduction while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a relative advantage if others are diluting.
0.10%
Diluted share change of 0.10% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight difference in equity issuance policy.
31.30%
Dividend growth of 31.30% while Technology median is flat. Walter Schloss might appreciate at least a modest improvement.
-1.84%
Negative OCF growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would ask if accounting or macro issues hamper the firm specifically.
0.24%
FCF growth of 0.24% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
45.31%
10Y revenue/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 17.41%. Joel Greenblatt would verify if a unique moat or brand fosters outperformance over a decade.
13.86%
5Y revenue/share growth 1.25-1.5x Technology median of 12.24%. Mohnish Pabrai might attribute the outperformance to scale or brand strength.
22.94%
3Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 9.00%. Joel Greenblatt might see a short-term competitive advantage at play.
141.93%
OCF/share CAGR of 141.93% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest edge that can add up if momentum improves.
62.92%
OCF/share CAGR of 62.92% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that can compound if momentum builds.
26.13%
3Y OCF/share growth of 26.13% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that could compound if momentum holds.
131.02%
Net income/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 19.51% over a decade. Joel Greenblatt might see a standout compounder of earnings.
300.73%
5Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 14.01%. Joel Greenblatt might see superior mid-term capital allocation or product strength.
123.41%
3Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 13.75%. Joel Greenblatt might see a recent surge from market share gains or cost synergy.
35.88%
Equity/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 1.86% over 10 years. Joel Greenblatt would see if a high ROE underlies this compounding advantage.
9.07%
5Y equity/share CAGR 75-90% of Technology median. John Neff calls for higher returns or more efficient buybacks to match peers.
5.67%
3Y equity/share CAGR 50-75% of Technology median. Guy Spier suspects suboptimal short-term capital usage vs. peers.
1168.08%
Dividend/share CAGR of 1168.08% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a minor improvement that could compound if the firm maintains consistent raises.
194.90%
5Y dividend/share CAGR of 194.90% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees at least some improvement that could compound over time.
66.90%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 66.90% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if the firm is at least inching up payouts.
-12.44%
AR shrinking while Technology median grows. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage unless it signals declining demand.
-1.00%
Decreasing inventory while Technology is rising. Seth Klarman might see an efficiency advantage or possibly a sign of weaker sales future.
1.33%
Asset growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 0.35%. Joel Greenblatt confirms strong expansions matched by adequate returns on those assets.
2.34%
BV/share growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median. Joel Greenblatt checks if consistent ROE or undervalued buybacks fuel this advantage.
-0.06%
Debt is shrinking while Technology median is rising. Seth Klarman might see an advantage if growth remains possible.
-2.83%
R&D dropping while Technology median is rising. Seth Klarman wonders if we risk ceding future innovation or if peers overspend.
-7.01%
SG&A decline while Technology grows. Seth Klarman sees potential cost advantage or a risk if it hurts future growth.