PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-0.35%
Negative revenue growth while Technology median is -1.99%. Seth Klarman would investigate if the company is losing market share or facing a declining industry.
0.52%
Positive gross profit growth while Technology median is negative. Peter Lynch would see a notable competitive edge in cost or pricing.
-16.03%
Negative EBIT growth while Technology median is -4.89%. Seth Klarman would check if external or internal factors caused the decline.
-5.08%
Negative operating income growth while Technology median is -6.99%. Seth Klarman would check if structural or cyclical issues are at play.
-4.78%
Negative net income growth while Technology median is -5.23%. Seth Klarman would investigate factors dragging net income down.
-4.81%
Negative EPS growth while Technology median is -4.76%. Seth Klarman would explore whether share dilution or profit declines are to blame.
-4.90%
Negative diluted EPS growth while Technology median is -4.95%. Seth Klarman would look for the cause: weakened profitability or heavier share issuance.
0.20%
Share change of 0.20% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss would see if the modest difference matters long-term.
0.10%
Diluted share change of 0.10% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight difference in equity issuance policy.
-0.00%
Dividend cuts while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others maintain or grow payouts, highlighting a relative weakness.
-42.68%
Negative OCF growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would ask if accounting or macro issues hamper the firm specifically.
-47.69%
Negative FCF growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others in the industry are still generating positive expansions in free cash.
54.04%
10Y revenue/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 24.83%. Joel Greenblatt would verify if a unique moat or brand fosters outperformance over a decade.
24.84%
5Y revenue/share growth 1.25-1.5x Technology median of 19.08%. Mohnish Pabrai might attribute the outperformance to scale or brand strength.
23.53%
3Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 11.15%. Joel Greenblatt might see a short-term competitive advantage at play.
107.34%
OCF/share CAGR of 107.34% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest edge that can add up if momentum improves.
102.79%
OCF/share CAGR of 102.79% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that can compound if momentum builds.
86.39%
3Y OCF/share growth of 86.39% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that could compound if momentum holds.
179.18%
Net income/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 34.18% over a decade. Joel Greenblatt might see a standout compounder of earnings.
330.89%
5Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 17.96%. Joel Greenblatt might see superior mid-term capital allocation or product strength.
121.75%
3Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 15.51%. Joel Greenblatt might see a recent surge from market share gains or cost synergy.
36.24%
Equity/share CAGR of 36.24% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage in net worth accumulation that could matter long term.
10.06%
5Y equity/share CAGR 50-75% of Technology median. Guy Spier sees subpar net worth creation vs. competitors.
8.51%
3Y equity/share CAGR 50-75% of Technology median. Guy Spier suspects suboptimal short-term capital usage vs. peers.
1145.59%
Dividend/share CAGR of 1145.59% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a minor improvement that could compound if the firm maintains consistent raises.
193.66%
5Y dividend/share CAGR of 193.66% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees at least some improvement that could compound over time.
66.64%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 66.64% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if the firm is at least inching up payouts.
5.52%
Slight AR growth while Technology cuts AR. Peter Lynch wonders if the firm is missing an opportunity to collect faster or if peers face sales declines.
2.96%
Inventory growth far above Technology median. Jim Chanos suspects major issues in demand forecasting or potential obsolescence risk.
-2.76%
Assets shrink while Technology median grows. Seth Klarman might see a strategic refocus or potential missed expansion if demand is present.
1.38%
BV/share growth of 1.38% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight lead that can expand if sustained over time.
-6.95%
Debt is shrinking while Technology median is rising. Seth Klarman might see an advantage if growth remains possible.
7.58%
R&D growth of 7.58% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss wonders if a slight increase yields a meaningful competitive edge.
6.81%
SG&A growth of 6.81% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a modest overhead increase needing revenue justification.