PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
11.45%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 1.78%. Joel Greenblatt would verify if operating margins keep pace with this top-line surge.
11.88%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 1.75%. Joel Greenblatt would check if cost advantages or brand equity drive this surge.
20.05%
EBIT growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 3.13%. Joel Greenblatt would examine whether a unique competitive edge supports this outperformance.
20.81%
Operating income growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 3.34%. Joel Greenblatt would see if unique processes drive exceptional profitability.
21.69%
Net income growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 3.26%. Joel Greenblatt would check if brand strength or cost advantages fuel this outperformance.
22.86%
EPS growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 2.35%. Joel Greenblatt would confirm if consistent earnings expansion underpins these gains.
22.33%
Diluted EPS growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 2.37%. Joel Greenblatt would confirm if strong net income growth or buybacks drive outperformance.
-0.60%
Share reduction while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a relative advantage if others are diluting.
-0.69%
Diluted share reduction while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if others are still diluting.
0.00%
Dividend growth of 0.00% while Technology median is flat. Walter Schloss might appreciate at least a modest improvement.
87.79%
OCF growth of 87.79% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest positive difference, which can compound over time.
100.52%
FCF growth of 100.52% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
61.16%
10Y revenue/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 24.73%. Joel Greenblatt would verify if a unique moat or brand fosters outperformance over a decade.
38.87%
5Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 20.76%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company’s moat drives rapid mid-term expansion.
26.13%
3Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 10.56%. Joel Greenblatt might see a short-term competitive advantage at play.
61.31%
OCF/share CAGR of 61.31% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest edge that can add up if momentum improves.
63.85%
OCF/share CAGR of 63.85% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that can compound if momentum builds.
33.59%
3Y OCF/share growth of 33.59% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that could compound if momentum holds.
137.49%
Net income/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 47.26% over a decade. Joel Greenblatt might see a standout compounder of earnings.
87.46%
5Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 33.73%. Joel Greenblatt might see superior mid-term capital allocation or product strength.
66.91%
3Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 11.80%. Joel Greenblatt might see a recent surge from market share gains or cost synergy.
41.50%
Equity/share CAGR of 41.50% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage in net worth accumulation that could matter long term.
10.21%
5Y equity/share CAGR 75-90% of Technology median. John Neff calls for higher returns or more efficient buybacks to match peers.
12.58%
3Y equity/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 7.64%. Joel Greenblatt sees strong short-term returns on equity fueling net worth growth.
522.75%
Dividend/share CAGR of 522.75% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a minor improvement that could compound if the firm maintains consistent raises.
191.83%
5Y dividend/share CAGR of 191.83% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees at least some improvement that could compound over time.
66.48%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 66.48% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if the firm is at least inching up payouts.
7.28%
AR growth of 7.28% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if the difference points to new credit strategy or stronger sales push.
-2.00%
Decreasing inventory while Technology is rising. Seth Klarman might see an efficiency advantage or possibly a sign of weaker sales future.
2.99%
Asset growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 0.77%. Joel Greenblatt confirms strong expansions matched by adequate returns on those assets.
3.24%
BV/share growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median. Joel Greenblatt checks if consistent ROE or undervalued buybacks fuel this advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.79%
R&D dropping while Technology median is rising. Seth Klarman wonders if we risk ceding future innovation or if peers overspend.
-5.07%
SG&A decline while Technology grows. Seth Klarman sees potential cost advantage or a risk if it hurts future growth.