205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
6.02%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 3.57%. Joel Greenblatt would verify if operating margins keep pace with this top-line surge.
7.03%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 3.87%. Joel Greenblatt would check if cost advantages or brand equity drive this surge.
10.15%
EBIT growth of 10.15% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss would see a marginal edge that could be expanded upon.
10.59%
Operating income growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 0.27%. Joel Greenblatt would see if unique processes drive exceptional profitability.
2.86%
Net income growth of 2.86% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see potential if moderate gains can keep rising.
3.62%
EPS growth of 3.62% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
3.70%
Diluted EPS growth of 3.70% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could improve over time.
-0.61%
Share reduction while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a relative advantage if others are diluting.
-0.80%
Diluted share reduction while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if others are still diluting.
-0.21%
Dividend cuts while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others maintain or grow payouts, highlighting a relative weakness.
64.21%
OCF growth of 64.21% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest positive difference, which can compound over time.
70.86%
FCF growth of 70.86% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
61.96%
10Y revenue/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 17.18%. Joel Greenblatt would verify if a unique moat or brand fosters outperformance over a decade.
48.84%
5Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 20.43%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company’s moat drives rapid mid-term expansion.
31.55%
3Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 12.09%. Joel Greenblatt might see a short-term competitive advantage at play.
375.35%
OCF/share CAGR of 375.35% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest edge that can add up if momentum improves.
205.86%
OCF/share CAGR of 205.86% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that can compound if momentum builds.
135.70%
3Y OCF/share growth of 135.70% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that could compound if momentum holds.
222.83%
Net income/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 23.46% over a decade. Joel Greenblatt might see a standout compounder of earnings.
140.33%
5Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 25.01%. Joel Greenblatt might see superior mid-term capital allocation or product strength.
113.67%
3Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 16.88%. Joel Greenblatt might see a recent surge from market share gains or cost synergy.
43.90%
Equity/share CAGR of 43.90% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage in net worth accumulation that could matter long term.
8.47%
5Y equity/share CAGR near Technology median. Charlie Munger finds it normal mid-term expansion for the industry.
10.29%
3Y equity/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 6.47%. Joel Greenblatt sees strong short-term returns on equity fueling net worth growth.
520.27%
Dividend/share CAGR of 520.27% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a minor improvement that could compound if the firm maintains consistent raises.
121.41%
5Y dividend/share CAGR of 121.41% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees at least some improvement that could compound over time.
81.19%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 81.19% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if the firm is at least inching up payouts.
6.67%
AR growth of 6.67% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if the difference points to new credit strategy or stronger sales push.
2.85%
Inventory growth of 2.85% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if we’re preparing for a sales push or risking overstock.
5.83%
Asset growth of 5.83% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if expansions yield good returns on capital.
0.54%
BV/share growth of 0.54% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight lead that can expand if sustained over time.
24.23%
Debt growth of 24.23% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest difference that matters if interest coverage is tight.
-0.26%
R&D dropping while Technology median is rising. Seth Klarman wonders if we risk ceding future innovation or if peers overspend.
1.85%
SG&A growth of 1.85% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a modest overhead increase needing revenue justification.