PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
6.07%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 1.36%. Joel Greenblatt would verify if operating margins keep pace with this top-line surge.
7.06%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 2.49%. Joel Greenblatt would check if cost advantages or brand equity drive this surge.
12.90%
EBIT growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 3.03%. Joel Greenblatt would examine whether a unique competitive edge supports this outperformance.
13.14%
Operating income growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 4.49%. Joel Greenblatt would see if unique processes drive exceptional profitability.
11.74%
Net income growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 2.59%. Joel Greenblatt would check if brand strength or cost advantages fuel this outperformance.
12.59%
EPS growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 1.38%. Joel Greenblatt would confirm if consistent earnings expansion underpins these gains.
12.86%
Diluted EPS growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 1.99%. Joel Greenblatt would confirm if strong net income growth or buybacks drive outperformance.
-0.82%
Share reduction while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a relative advantage if others are diluting.
-0.80%
Diluted share reduction while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if others are still diluting.
0.16%
Dividend growth of 0.16% while Technology median is flat. Walter Schloss might appreciate at least a modest improvement.
15.33%
OCF growth of 15.33% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest positive difference, which can compound over time.
10.08%
FCF growth of 10.08% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
69.30%
10Y revenue/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 28.45%. Joel Greenblatt would verify if a unique moat or brand fosters outperformance over a decade.
48.57%
5Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 21.94%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company’s moat drives rapid mid-term expansion.
30.76%
3Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 14.37%. Joel Greenblatt might see a short-term competitive advantage at play.
169.40%
OCF/share CAGR of 169.40% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest edge that can add up if momentum improves.
106.95%
OCF/share CAGR of 106.95% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that can compound if momentum builds.
57.28%
3Y OCF/share growth of 57.28% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that could compound if momentum holds.
275.27%
Net income/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 62.83% over a decade. Joel Greenblatt might see a standout compounder of earnings.
182.32%
5Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 29.97%. Joel Greenblatt might see superior mid-term capital allocation or product strength.
107.02%
3Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 20.69%. Joel Greenblatt might see a recent surge from market share gains or cost synergy.
40.20%
Equity/share CAGR of 40.20% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage in net worth accumulation that could matter long term.
7.63%
5Y equity/share CAGR 50-75% of Technology median. Guy Spier sees subpar net worth creation vs. competitors.
10.99%
3Y equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x Technology median. Mohnish Pabrai credits disciplined capital allocation for short-term outperformance.
518.41%
Dividend/share CAGR of 518.41% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a minor improvement that could compound if the firm maintains consistent raises.
121.07%
5Y dividend/share CAGR of 121.07% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees at least some improvement that could compound over time.
82.03%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 82.03% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if the firm is at least inching up payouts.
2.19%
AR growth of 2.19% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if the difference points to new credit strategy or stronger sales push.
1.24%
Inventory growth of 1.24% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if we’re preparing for a sales push or risking overstock.
0.25%
Asset growth 1.25-1.5x Technology median. Mohnish Pabrai sees if expansions are strategic and well-supported by end demand.
-0.29%
Negative BV/share change while Technology median is 0.45%. Seth Klarman sees a firm-specific weakness if peers accumulate net worth.
0.02%
Debt growth of 0.02% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest difference that matters if interest coverage is tight.
1.56%
R&D growth of 1.56% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss wonders if a slight increase yields a meaningful competitive edge.
-10.20%
SG&A decline while Technology grows. Seth Klarman sees potential cost advantage or a risk if it hurts future growth.