PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-12.77%
Negative revenue growth while Technology median is 2.06%. Seth Klarman would investigate if the company is losing market share or facing a declining industry.
-14.16%
Negative gross profit growth while Technology median is 0.51%. Seth Klarman would suspect poor product pricing or inefficient production.
-21.48%
Negative EBIT growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check if external or internal factors caused the decline.
-21.73%
Negative operating income growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check if structural or cyclical issues are at play.
-21.08%
Negative net income growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate factors dragging net income down.
-19.88%
Negative EPS growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would explore whether share dilution or profit declines are to blame.
-19.62%
Negative diluted EPS growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would look for the cause: weakened profitability or heavier share issuance.
-1.65%
Share reduction while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a relative advantage if others are diluting.
-1.92%
Diluted share reduction while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if others are still diluting.
24.31%
Dividend growth of 24.31% while Technology median is flat. Walter Schloss might appreciate at least a modest improvement.
1.85%
OCF growth of 1.85% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest positive difference, which can compound over time.
4.95%
FCF growth of 4.95% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
100.57%
10Y revenue/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 27.57%. Joel Greenblatt would verify if a unique moat or brand fosters outperformance over a decade.
39.89%
5Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 20.51%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company’s moat drives rapid mid-term expansion.
23.68%
3Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 14.17%. Joel Greenblatt might see a short-term competitive advantage at play.
157.89%
OCF/share CAGR of 157.89% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest edge that can add up if momentum improves.
103.87%
OCF/share CAGR of 103.87% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that can compound if momentum builds.
59.17%
3Y OCF/share growth of 59.17% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that could compound if momentum holds.
1456.48%
Net income/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 55.04% over a decade. Joel Greenblatt might see a standout compounder of earnings.
176.30%
5Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 27.42%. Joel Greenblatt might see superior mid-term capital allocation or product strength.
57.27%
3Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 25.35%. Joel Greenblatt might see a recent surge from market share gains or cost synergy.
29.63%
Equity/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 13.82% over 10 years. Joel Greenblatt would see if a high ROE underlies this compounding advantage.
-5.16%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while Technology median is 21.88%. Seth Klarman suspects firm-specific weaknesses if peers grow equity mid-term.
-4.04%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while Technology median is 14.06%. Seth Klarman sees a short-term weakness if peers still expand net worth.
601.64%
Dividend/share CAGR of 601.64% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a minor improvement that could compound if the firm maintains consistent raises.
157.27%
5Y dividend/share CAGR of 157.27% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees at least some improvement that could compound over time.
102.33%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 102.33% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if the firm is at least inching up payouts.
-23.85%
AR shrinking while Technology median grows. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage unless it signals declining demand.
4.77%
Inventory growth of 4.77% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if we’re preparing for a sales push or risking overstock.
-7.73%
Assets shrink while Technology median grows. Seth Klarman might see a strategic refocus or potential missed expansion if demand is present.
-13.04%
Negative BV/share change while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a firm-specific weakness if peers accumulate net worth.
0.02%
Debt growth of 0.02% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest difference that matters if interest coverage is tight.
2.56%
R&D growth of 2.56% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss wonders if a slight increase yields a meaningful competitive edge.
4.55%
SG&A growth of 4.55% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a modest overhead increase needing revenue justification.