PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
2.06%
Revenue growth 50-75% of Technology median of 2.91%. Guy Spier would worry if the firm is losing market share.
4.38%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 2.77%. Joel Greenblatt would check if cost advantages or brand equity drive this surge.
10.11%
EBIT growth of 10.11% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss would see a marginal edge that could be expanded upon.
9.21%
Operating income growth of 9.21% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that can expand.
7.23%
Net income growth of 7.23% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see potential if moderate gains can keep rising.
6.98%
EPS growth of 6.98% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
7.94%
Diluted EPS growth of 7.94% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could improve over time.
-0.21%
Share reduction while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a relative advantage if others are diluting.
-0.31%
Diluted share reduction while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if others are still diluting.
-0.06%
Dividend cuts while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others maintain or grow payouts, highlighting a relative weakness.
62.24%
OCF growth of 62.24% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest positive difference, which can compound over time.
76.64%
FCF growth of 76.64% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
101.87%
10Y revenue/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 32.76%. Joel Greenblatt would verify if a unique moat or brand fosters outperformance over a decade.
27.36%
5Y revenue/share growth 1.25-1.5x Technology median of 19.08%. Mohnish Pabrai might attribute the outperformance to scale or brand strength.
20.00%
3Y revenue/share growth 1.25-1.5x Technology median of 14.62%. Mohnish Pabrai would attribute it to strong near-term market positioning.
336.00%
OCF/share CAGR of 336.00% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest edge that can add up if momentum improves.
164.88%
OCF/share CAGR of 164.88% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that can compound if momentum builds.
79.90%
3Y OCF/share growth of 79.90% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that could compound if momentum holds.
578.69%
Net income/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 41.13% over a decade. Joel Greenblatt might see a standout compounder of earnings.
118.39%
5Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 14.52%. Joel Greenblatt might see superior mid-term capital allocation or product strength.
70.62%
3Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 13.91%. Joel Greenblatt might see a recent surge from market share gains or cost synergy.
24.55%
Equity/share CAGR of 24.55% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage in net worth accumulation that could matter long term.
-7.32%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while Technology median is 7.43%. Seth Klarman suspects firm-specific weaknesses if peers grow equity mid-term.
-8.78%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while Technology median is 10.80%. Seth Klarman sees a short-term weakness if peers still expand net worth.
602.36%
Dividend/share CAGR of 602.36% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a minor improvement that could compound if the firm maintains consistent raises.
155.50%
5Y dividend/share CAGR of 155.50% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees at least some improvement that could compound over time.
102.39%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 102.39% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if the firm is at least inching up payouts.
-1.46%
AR shrinking while Technology median grows. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage unless it signals declining demand.
-2.44%
Decreasing inventory while Technology is rising. Seth Klarman might see an efficiency advantage or possibly a sign of weaker sales future.
-0.34%
Assets shrink while Technology median grows. Seth Klarman might see a strategic refocus or potential missed expansion if demand is present.
-0.17%
Negative BV/share change while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a firm-specific weakness if peers accumulate net worth.
0.10%
Debt growth of 0.10% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest difference that matters if interest coverage is tight.
0.26%
R&D growth of 0.26% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss wonders if a slight increase yields a meaningful competitive edge.
1.45%
SG&A growth of 1.45% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a modest overhead increase needing revenue justification.