PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-11.16%
Negative revenue growth while Technology median is 3.62%. Seth Klarman would investigate if the company is losing market share or facing a declining industry.
-14.27%
Negative gross profit growth while Technology median is 1.72%. Seth Klarman would suspect poor product pricing or inefficient production.
-19.78%
Negative EBIT growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check if external or internal factors caused the decline.
-21.40%
Negative operating income growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check if structural or cyclical issues are at play.
-24.91%
Negative net income growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate factors dragging net income down.
-25.00%
Negative EPS growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would explore whether share dilution or profit declines are to blame.
-24.83%
Negative diluted EPS growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would look for the cause: weakened profitability or heavier share issuance.
-0.21%
Share reduction while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a relative advantage if others are diluting.
-0.21%
Diluted share reduction while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if others are still diluting.
16.89%
Dividend growth of 16.89% while Technology median is flat. Walter Schloss might appreciate at least a modest improvement.
-11.95%
Negative OCF growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would ask if accounting or macro issues hamper the firm specifically.
-13.67%
Negative FCF growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others in the industry are still generating positive expansions in free cash.
48.40%
10Y revenue/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 31.41%. Joel Greenblatt would verify if a unique moat or brand fosters outperformance over a decade.
14.96%
5Y revenue/share growth near Technology median of 15.65%. Charlie Munger might see typical industry or economic growth patterns.
4.75%
3Y revenue/share growth below 50% of Technology median of 11.76%. Jim Chanos would suspect a significant short-term erosion in competitiveness.
133.26%
OCF/share CAGR of 133.26% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest edge that can add up if momentum improves.
54.69%
OCF/share CAGR of 54.69% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that can compound if momentum builds.
35.00%
3Y OCF/share growth of 35.00% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that could compound if momentum holds.
117.46%
Net income/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 2.97% over a decade. Joel Greenblatt might see a standout compounder of earnings.
45.49%
5Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 3.90%. Joel Greenblatt might see superior mid-term capital allocation or product strength.
9.10%
3Y net income/share CAGR of 9.10% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a small advantage that can be scaled further.
21.96%
Equity/share CAGR 75-90% of Technology median. John Neff would urge improved returns on retained earnings to catch up.
-3.83%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while Technology median is 18.16%. Seth Klarman suspects firm-specific weaknesses if peers grow equity mid-term.
-9.21%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while Technology median is 13.96%. Seth Klarman sees a short-term weakness if peers still expand net worth.
651.36%
Dividend/share CAGR of 651.36% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a minor improvement that could compound if the firm maintains consistent raises.
165.01%
5Y dividend/share CAGR of 165.01% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees at least some improvement that could compound over time.
79.91%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 79.91% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if the firm is at least inching up payouts.
-19.97%
AR shrinking while Technology median grows. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage unless it signals declining demand.
-1.91%
Decreasing inventory while Technology is rising. Seth Klarman might see an efficiency advantage or possibly a sign of weaker sales future.
0.14%
Asset growth of 0.14% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if expansions yield good returns on capital.
-0.66%
Negative BV/share change while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a firm-specific weakness if peers accumulate net worth.
-0.20%
Debt is shrinking while Technology median is rising. Seth Klarman might see an advantage if growth remains possible.
1.85%
R&D growth of 1.85% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss wonders if a slight increase yields a meaningful competitive edge.
3.26%
SG&A growth of 3.26% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a modest overhead increase needing revenue justification.