PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
5.23%
Positive revenue growth while Technology median is negative. Peter Lynch might see a relative strength advantage in a tough sector.
5.71%
Gross profit growth of 5.71% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that could be built upon.
0.51%
EBIT growth of 0.51% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss would see a marginal edge that could be expanded upon.
6.95%
Positive operating income growth while Technology is negative. Peter Lynch would spot a big relative advantage here.
3.85%
Positive net income growth while Technology median is negative. Peter Lynch would view this as a notable competitive advantage.
3.83%
Positive EPS growth while Technology median is negative. Peter Lynch might see a strong advantage in per-share earnings compared to peers.
3.89%
Positive diluted EPS growth while Technology median is negative. Peter Lynch might see a real advantage in how this firm manages share count or drives net income.
0.33%
Share growth above Technology median by more than 2x. Jim Chanos would suspect over-dilution or repeated equity raises.
0.32%
Diluted share change of 0.32% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight difference in equity issuance policy.
-0.01%
Dividend cuts while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others maintain or grow payouts, highlighting a relative weakness.
-12.94%
Negative OCF growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would ask if accounting or macro issues hamper the firm specifically.
-19.39%
Negative FCF growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others in the industry are still generating positive expansions in free cash.
60.04%
10Y revenue/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 29.79%. Joel Greenblatt would verify if a unique moat or brand fosters outperformance over a decade.
55.67%
5Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 22.96%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company’s moat drives rapid mid-term expansion.
20.69%
3Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 11.44%. Joel Greenblatt might see a short-term competitive advantage at play.
353.80%
OCF/share CAGR of 353.80% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest edge that can add up if momentum improves.
269.23%
OCF/share CAGR of 269.23% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that can compound if momentum builds.
77.37%
3Y OCF/share growth of 77.37% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that could compound if momentum holds.
233.16%
Net income/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 46.52% over a decade. Joel Greenblatt might see a standout compounder of earnings.
169.17%
5Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 55.21%. Joel Greenblatt might see superior mid-term capital allocation or product strength.
36.82%
3Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 23.79%. Joel Greenblatt might see a recent surge from market share gains or cost synergy.
21.69%
Equity/share CAGR 50-75% of Technology median. Guy Spier sees subpar expansion vs. peers’ net worth growth.
13.46%
Below 50% of Technology median. Jim Chanos suspects weak profitability or questionable capital allocation limiting equity growth.
1.85%
Below 50% of Technology median. Jim Chanos worries about inadequate short-term profitability or repeated asset impairments.
677.64%
Dividend/share CAGR of 677.64% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a minor improvement that could compound if the firm maintains consistent raises.
167.94%
5Y dividend/share CAGR of 167.94% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees at least some improvement that could compound over time.
64.02%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 64.02% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if the firm is at least inching up payouts.
12.02%
AR growth of 12.02% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if the difference points to new credit strategy or stronger sales push.
-3.32%
Decreasing inventory while Technology is rising. Seth Klarman might see an efficiency advantage or possibly a sign of weaker sales future.
1.49%
Asset growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 0.64%. Joel Greenblatt confirms strong expansions matched by adequate returns on those assets.
10.30%
BV/share growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median. Joel Greenblatt checks if consistent ROE or undervalued buybacks fuel this advantage.
-12.21%
Debt is shrinking while Technology median is rising. Seth Klarman might see an advantage if growth remains possible.
-0.52%
R&D dropping while Technology median is rising. Seth Klarman wonders if we risk ceding future innovation or if peers overspend.
6.78%
SG&A growth of 6.78% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a modest overhead increase needing revenue justification.