PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
1.38%
Revenue growth 50-75% of Technology median of 2.68%. Guy Spier would worry if the firm is losing market share.
2.44%
Gross profit growth 75-90% of Technology median of 3.01%. John Neff would watch if higher volumes can lift margins eventually.
1.49%
EBIT growth near Technology median of 1.37%. Charlie Munger would expect industry-level profitability trends are driving results.
4.16%
Operating income growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 2.10%. Joel Greenblatt would see if unique processes drive exceptional profitability.
0.83%
Net income growth below 50% of Technology median of 2.16%. Jim Chanos would suspect deeper profitability issues.
0.96%
EPS growth below 50% of Technology median of 2.74%. Jim Chanos would suspect fundamental earnings weakness or heavy dilution.
0.98%
Diluted EPS growth below 50% of Technology median of 2.55%. Jim Chanos would suspect fundamental profit weaknesses or heavy share issuance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.11%
Diluted share reduction while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if others are still diluting.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
14.47%
OCF growth of 14.47% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest positive difference, which can compound over time.
11.93%
FCF growth of 11.93% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
66.03%
10Y revenue/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 31.06%. Joel Greenblatt would verify if a unique moat or brand fosters outperformance over a decade.
37.03%
5Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 22.94%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company’s moat drives rapid mid-term expansion.
14.40%
3Y revenue/share growth 1.25-1.5x Technology median of 11.69%. Mohnish Pabrai would attribute it to strong near-term market positioning.
164.44%
OCF/share CAGR of 164.44% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest edge that can add up if momentum improves.
86.38%
OCF/share CAGR of 86.38% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that can compound if momentum builds.
21.04%
3Y OCF/share growth of 21.04% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that could compound if momentum holds.
301.53%
Net income/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 44.02% over a decade. Joel Greenblatt might see a standout compounder of earnings.
118.16%
5Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 32.57%. Joel Greenblatt might see superior mid-term capital allocation or product strength.
30.19%
3Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 19.00%. Joel Greenblatt might see a recent surge from market share gains or cost synergy.
36.59%
Equity/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 11.13% over 10 years. Joel Greenblatt would see if a high ROE underlies this compounding advantage.
28.13%
5Y equity/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 17.97%. Joel Greenblatt sees a possible ROE advantage or fewer share issuances boosting book value.
21.31%
3Y equity/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 12.57%. Joel Greenblatt sees strong short-term returns on equity fueling net worth growth.
688.88%
Dividend/share CAGR of 688.88% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a minor improvement that could compound if the firm maintains consistent raises.
167.47%
5Y dividend/share CAGR of 167.47% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees at least some improvement that could compound over time.
64.28%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 64.28% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if the firm is at least inching up payouts.
3.90%
Receivables growth far exceeding Technology median. Jim Chanos suspects potential red flags in revenue quality.
0.38%
Inventory growth of 0.38% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if we’re preparing for a sales push or risking overstock.
12.96%
Asset growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 1.66%. Joel Greenblatt confirms strong expansions matched by adequate returns on those assets.
8.95%
BV/share growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median. Joel Greenblatt checks if consistent ROE or undervalued buybacks fuel this advantage.
23.80%
Debt growth of 23.80% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest difference that matters if interest coverage is tight.
-0.77%
R&D dropping while Technology median is rising. Seth Klarman wonders if we risk ceding future innovation or if peers overspend.
-3.06%
SG&A decline while Technology grows. Seth Klarman sees potential cost advantage or a risk if it hurts future growth.