PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
4.07%
Revenue growth 50-75% of Technology median of 6.02%. Guy Spier would worry if the firm is losing market share.
6.28%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 3.78%. Joel Greenblatt would check if cost advantages or brand equity drive this surge.
8.28%
EBIT growth of 8.28% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss would see a marginal edge that could be expanded upon.
8.59%
Operating income growth of 8.59% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that can expand.
9.81%
Net income growth of 9.81% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see potential if moderate gains can keep rising.
9.48%
EPS growth of 9.48% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
9.66%
Diluted EPS growth of 9.66% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could improve over time.
0.11%
Share change of 0.11% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss would see if the modest difference matters long-term.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
12.62%
Dividend growth of 12.62% while Technology median is flat. Walter Schloss might appreciate at least a modest improvement.
-2.92%
Negative OCF growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would ask if accounting or macro issues hamper the firm specifically.
-44.64%
Negative FCF growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others in the industry are still generating positive expansions in free cash.
73.70%
10Y revenue/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 30.32%. Joel Greenblatt would verify if a unique moat or brand fosters outperformance over a decade.
52.56%
5Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 21.81%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company’s moat drives rapid mid-term expansion.
34.08%
3Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 13.02%. Joel Greenblatt might see a short-term competitive advantage at play.
198.43%
OCF/share CAGR of 198.43% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest edge that can add up if momentum improves.
83.17%
OCF/share CAGR of 83.17% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that can compound if momentum builds.
13.33%
3Y OCF/share growth of 13.33% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that could compound if momentum holds.
782.06%
Net income/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 23.90% over a decade. Joel Greenblatt might see a standout compounder of earnings.
120.11%
5Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 20.24%. Joel Greenblatt might see superior mid-term capital allocation or product strength.
77.97%
3Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 10.69%. Joel Greenblatt might see a recent surge from market share gains or cost synergy.
49.67%
Equity/share CAGR near Technology median. Charlie Munger could view it as standard for the sector’s long-term capital usage.
37.23%
5Y equity/share CAGR near Technology median. Charlie Munger finds it normal mid-term expansion for the industry.
52.90%
3Y equity/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 22.27%. Joel Greenblatt sees strong short-term returns on equity fueling net worth growth.
576.51%
Dividend/share CAGR of 576.51% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a minor improvement that could compound if the firm maintains consistent raises.
129.41%
5Y dividend/share CAGR of 129.41% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees at least some improvement that could compound over time.
48.82%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 48.82% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if the firm is at least inching up payouts.
2.90%
AR growth of 2.90% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if the difference points to new credit strategy or stronger sales push.
2.52%
Inventory growth of 2.52% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if we’re preparing for a sales push or risking overstock.
6.03%
Asset growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 1.52%. Joel Greenblatt confirms strong expansions matched by adequate returns on those assets.
9.61%
BV/share growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median. Joel Greenblatt checks if consistent ROE or undervalued buybacks fuel this advantage.
6.03%
Debt growth of 6.03% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest difference that matters if interest coverage is tight.
0.26%
R&D growth of 0.26% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss wonders if a slight increase yields a meaningful competitive edge.
-1.94%
SG&A decline while Technology grows. Seth Klarman sees potential cost advantage or a risk if it hurts future growth.