PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
1.51%
Positive revenue growth while Technology median is negative. Peter Lynch might see a relative strength advantage in a tough sector.
2.75%
Gross profit growth of 2.75% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that could be built upon.
2.63%
EBIT growth of 2.63% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss would see a marginal edge that could be expanded upon.
2.40%
Operating income growth of 2.40% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that can expand.
2.95%
Positive net income growth while Technology median is negative. Peter Lynch would view this as a notable competitive advantage.
3.03%
EPS growth of 3.03% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
3.96%
Diluted EPS growth of 3.96% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could improve over time.
-0.11%
Share reduction while Technology median is 0.01%. Seth Klarman would see a relative advantage if others are diluting.
-0.21%
Diluted share reduction while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if others are still diluting.
0.20%
Dividend growth of 0.20% while Technology median is flat. Walter Schloss might appreciate at least a modest improvement.
-9.04%
Negative OCF growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would ask if accounting or macro issues hamper the firm specifically.
58.23%
FCF growth of 58.23% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
94.62%
10Y revenue/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 43.61%. Joel Greenblatt would verify if a unique moat or brand fosters outperformance over a decade.
55.90%
5Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 26.94%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company’s moat drives rapid mid-term expansion.
38.84%
3Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 18.97%. Joel Greenblatt might see a short-term competitive advantage at play.
491.32%
OCF/share CAGR of 491.32% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest edge that can add up if momentum improves.
191.60%
OCF/share CAGR of 191.60% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that can compound if momentum builds.
97.03%
3Y OCF/share growth of 97.03% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that could compound if momentum holds.
928.53%
Net income/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 57.32% over a decade. Joel Greenblatt might see a standout compounder of earnings.
138.70%
5Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 39.90%. Joel Greenblatt might see superior mid-term capital allocation or product strength.
83.99%
3Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 28.89%. Joel Greenblatt might see a recent surge from market share gains or cost synergy.
56.79%
Equity/share CAGR near Technology median. Charlie Munger could view it as standard for the sector’s long-term capital usage.
42.46%
5Y equity/share CAGR near Technology median. Charlie Munger finds it normal mid-term expansion for the industry.
67.39%
3Y equity/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 23.05%. Joel Greenblatt sees strong short-term returns on equity fueling net worth growth.
575.06%
Dividend/share CAGR of 575.06% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a minor improvement that could compound if the firm maintains consistent raises.
129.88%
5Y dividend/share CAGR of 129.88% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees at least some improvement that could compound over time.
49.37%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 49.37% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if the firm is at least inching up payouts.
5.53%
AR growth of 5.53% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if the difference points to new credit strategy or stronger sales push.
7.85%
Inventory growth far above Technology median. Jim Chanos suspects major issues in demand forecasting or potential obsolescence risk.
2.43%
Asset growth of 2.43% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if expansions yield good returns on capital.
5.24%
BV/share growth of 5.24% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight lead that can expand if sustained over time.
-5.65%
Debt is shrinking while Technology median is rising. Seth Klarman might see an advantage if growth remains possible.
0.51%
R&D growth of 0.51% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss wonders if a slight increase yields a meaningful competitive edge.
4.46%
SG&A growth of 4.46% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a modest overhead increase needing revenue justification.