PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
0.56%
Revenue growth below 50% of Technology median of 1.54%. Jim Chanos would be concerned about potential secular decline.
-0.22%
Negative gross profit growth while Technology median is 2.06%. Seth Klarman would suspect poor product pricing or inefficient production.
-0.70%
Negative EBIT growth while Technology median is 1.28%. Seth Klarman would check if external or internal factors caused the decline.
-1.65%
Negative operating income growth while Technology median is 3.28%. Seth Klarman would check if structural or cyclical issues are at play.
0.17%
Net income growth below 50% of Technology median of 1.24%. Jim Chanos would suspect deeper profitability issues.
1.21%
EPS growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 0.80%. Joel Greenblatt would confirm if consistent earnings expansion underpins these gains.
0.82%
Diluted EPS growth near Technology median of 0.85%. Charlie Munger would expect typical industry-level share usage and profit trends.
-0.76%
Share reduction while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a relative advantage if others are diluting.
-0.75%
Diluted share reduction while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if others are still diluting.
-0.09%
Dividend cuts while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others maintain or grow payouts, highlighting a relative weakness.
56.45%
OCF growth of 56.45% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest positive difference, which can compound over time.
68.74%
FCF growth of 68.74% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
91.35%
10Y revenue/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 21.56%. Joel Greenblatt would verify if a unique moat or brand fosters outperformance over a decade.
37.79%
5Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 16.60%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company’s moat drives rapid mid-term expansion.
42.33%
3Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 13.73%. Joel Greenblatt might see a short-term competitive advantage at play.
184.81%
OCF/share CAGR of 184.81% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest edge that can add up if momentum improves.
73.82%
OCF/share CAGR of 73.82% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that can compound if momentum builds.
42.20%
3Y OCF/share growth of 42.20% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that could compound if momentum holds.
262.30%
Net income/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 0.52% over a decade. Joel Greenblatt might see a standout compounder of earnings.
93.27%
Net income/share CAGR of 93.27% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that can expand mid-term.
64.93%
3Y net income/share CAGR of 64.93% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a small advantage that can be scaled further.
57.46%
Equity/share CAGR of 57.46% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage in net worth accumulation that could matter long term.
42.87%
5Y equity/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 5.75%. Joel Greenblatt sees a possible ROE advantage or fewer share issuances boosting book value.
65.35%
3Y equity/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 8.32%. Joel Greenblatt sees strong short-term returns on equity fueling net worth growth.
570.52%
Dividend/share CAGR of 570.52% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a minor improvement that could compound if the firm maintains consistent raises.
129.76%
5Y dividend/share CAGR of 129.76% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees at least some improvement that could compound over time.
49.28%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 49.28% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if the firm is at least inching up payouts.
-6.85%
AR shrinking while Technology median grows. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage unless it signals declining demand.
9.32%
Inventory growth far above Technology median. Jim Chanos suspects major issues in demand forecasting or potential obsolescence risk.
5.40%
Asset growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 0.14%. Joel Greenblatt confirms strong expansions matched by adequate returns on those assets.
3.73%
BV/share growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median. Joel Greenblatt checks if consistent ROE or undervalued buybacks fuel this advantage.
9.57%
Slightly rising debt while Technology median is deleveraging. Peter Lynch wonders if the firm lags behind peers in risk control or invests in more expansions.
4.11%
R&D growth of 4.11% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss wonders if a slight increase yields a meaningful competitive edge.
2.13%
SG&A growth of 2.13% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a modest overhead increase needing revenue justification.