PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-10.89%
Negative revenue growth while Technology median is 2.64%. Seth Klarman would investigate if the company is losing market share or facing a declining industry.
-14.65%
Negative gross profit growth while Technology median is 0.97%. Seth Klarman would suspect poor product pricing or inefficient production.
-17.85%
Negative EBIT growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check if external or internal factors caused the decline.
-18.75%
Negative operating income growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check if structural or cyclical issues are at play.
-14.51%
Negative net income growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate factors dragging net income down.
-13.94%
Negative EPS growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would explore whether share dilution or profit declines are to blame.
-13.77%
Negative diluted EPS growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would look for the cause: weakened profitability or heavier share issuance.
-0.77%
Share reduction while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a relative advantage if others are diluting.
-0.76%
Diluted share reduction while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if others are still diluting.
7.68%
Dividend growth of 7.68% while Technology median is flat. Walter Schloss might appreciate at least a modest improvement.
-26.17%
Negative OCF growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would ask if accounting or macro issues hamper the firm specifically.
-45.60%
Negative FCF growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others in the industry are still generating positive expansions in free cash.
92.58%
10Y revenue/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 26.19%. Joel Greenblatt would verify if a unique moat or brand fosters outperformance over a decade.
35.39%
5Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 17.36%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company’s moat drives rapid mid-term expansion.
43.56%
3Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 14.05%. Joel Greenblatt might see a short-term competitive advantage at play.
131.20%
OCF/share CAGR of 131.20% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest edge that can add up if momentum improves.
15.09%
OCF/share CAGR of 15.09% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that can compound if momentum builds.
19.89%
3Y OCF/share growth of 19.89% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that could compound if momentum holds.
812.98%
Net income/share CAGR of 812.98% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a marginal edge that can grow if the firm invests wisely.
520.08%
Net income/share CAGR of 520.08% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that can expand mid-term.
88.83%
3Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 2.87%. Joel Greenblatt might see a recent surge from market share gains or cost synergy.
63.37%
Equity/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 41.41% over 10 years. Joel Greenblatt would see if a high ROE underlies this compounding advantage.
53.31%
5Y equity/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 26.17%. Joel Greenblatt sees a possible ROE advantage or fewer share issuances boosting book value.
68.54%
3Y equity/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 18.64%. Joel Greenblatt sees strong short-term returns on equity fueling net worth growth.
487.06%
Dividend/share CAGR of 487.06% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a minor improvement that could compound if the firm maintains consistent raises.
99.82%
5Y dividend/share CAGR of 99.82% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees at least some improvement that could compound over time.
37.51%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 37.51% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if the firm is at least inching up payouts.
-7.11%
AR shrinking while Technology median grows. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage unless it signals declining demand.
14.68%
Inventory growth of 14.68% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if we’re preparing for a sales push or risking overstock.
4.41%
Asset growth of 4.41% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if expansions yield good returns on capital.
1.26%
BV/share growth of 1.26% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight lead that can expand if sustained over time.
14.39%
Debt growth of 14.39% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest difference that matters if interest coverage is tight.
0.70%
R&D growth of 0.70% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss wonders if a slight increase yields a meaningful competitive edge.
-0.46%
SG&A decline while Technology grows. Seth Klarman sees potential cost advantage or a risk if it hurts future growth.