PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
3.47%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 2.09%. Joel Greenblatt would verify if operating margins keep pace with this top-line surge.
1.64%
Gross profit growth near Technology median of 1.71%. Charlie Munger would expect typical industry cost structures.
3.82%
EBIT growth of 3.82% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss would see a marginal edge that could be expanded upon.
1.96%
Operating income growth of 1.96% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that can expand.
0.82%
Net income growth of 0.82% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see potential if moderate gains can keep rising.
0.53%
EPS growth of 0.53% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
1.08%
Diluted EPS growth of 1.08% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could improve over time.
0.11%
Share change of 0.11% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss would see if the modest difference matters long-term.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.11%
Dividend cuts while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others maintain or grow payouts, highlighting a relative weakness.
20.60%
OCF growth of 20.60% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest positive difference, which can compound over time.
-126.40%
Negative FCF growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others in the industry are still generating positive expansions in free cash.
80.64%
10Y revenue/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 27.90%. Joel Greenblatt would verify if a unique moat or brand fosters outperformance over a decade.
21.37%
5Y revenue/share growth 1.25-1.5x Technology median of 17.09%. Mohnish Pabrai might attribute the outperformance to scale or brand strength.
41.12%
3Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 20.37%. Joel Greenblatt might see a short-term competitive advantage at play.
152.14%
OCF/share CAGR of 152.14% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest edge that can add up if momentum improves.
-17.56%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a firm-specific issue if peers still expand cash flow.
-17.95%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check whether it’s cyclical or a firm-specific problem.
216.94%
Net income/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 11.54% over a decade. Joel Greenblatt might see a standout compounder of earnings.
31.88%
5Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 6.27%. Joel Greenblatt might see superior mid-term capital allocation or product strength.
25.88%
3Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 12.91%. Joel Greenblatt might see a recent surge from market share gains or cost synergy.
74.95%
Equity/share CAGR of 74.95% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage in net worth accumulation that could matter long term.
61.29%
5Y equity/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 4.68%. Joel Greenblatt sees a possible ROE advantage or fewer share issuances boosting book value.
110.37%
3Y equity/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 8.62%. Joel Greenblatt sees strong short-term returns on equity fueling net worth growth.
342.27%
Dividend/share CAGR of 342.27% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a minor improvement that could compound if the firm maintains consistent raises.
99.75%
5Y dividend/share CAGR of 99.75% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees at least some improvement that could compound over time.
37.90%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 37.90% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if the firm is at least inching up payouts.
4.21%
AR growth of 4.21% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if the difference points to new credit strategy or stronger sales push.
13.41%
Inventory growth of 13.41% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if we’re preparing for a sales push or risking overstock.
5.88%
Asset growth of 5.88% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if expansions yield good returns on capital.
4.46%
BV/share growth of 4.46% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight lead that can expand if sustained over time.
10.79%
Debt growth of 10.79% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest difference that matters if interest coverage is tight.
4.84%
R&D growth of 4.84% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss wonders if a slight increase yields a meaningful competitive edge.
-2.74%
SG&A decline while Technology grows. Seth Klarman sees potential cost advantage or a risk if it hurts future growth.