PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
0.02%
Revenue growth below 50% of Technology median of 0.43%. Jim Chanos would be concerned about potential secular decline.
-3.26%
Negative gross profit growth while Technology median is 1.87%. Seth Klarman would suspect poor product pricing or inefficient production.
-3.40%
Negative EBIT growth while Technology median is 4.80%. Seth Klarman would check if external or internal factors caused the decline.
-4.06%
Negative operating income growth while Technology median is 5.76%. Seth Klarman would check if structural or cyclical issues are at play.
-0.75%
Negative net income growth while Technology median is 4.39%. Seth Klarman would investigate factors dragging net income down.
-0.53%
Negative EPS growth while Technology median is 4.44%. Seth Klarman would explore whether share dilution or profit declines are to blame.
-1.07%
Negative diluted EPS growth while Technology median is 4.99%. Seth Klarman would look for the cause: weakened profitability or heavier share issuance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.09%
Dividend growth of 0.09% while Technology median is flat. Walter Schloss might appreciate at least a modest improvement.
38.46%
OCF growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 2.08%. Joel Greenblatt would see if a superior business model or cost structure drives strong cash generation.
1040.43%
FCF growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 3.19%. Joel Greenblatt would see if high profitability or prudent capex drives outperformance.
68.63%
10Y revenue/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 24.04%. Joel Greenblatt would verify if a unique moat or brand fosters outperformance over a decade.
13.51%
5Y revenue/share growth 75-90% of Technology median of 16.22%. John Neff would expect a plan to align with peers or surpass them.
19.91%
3Y revenue/share growth 1.25-1.5x Technology median of 15.62%. Mohnish Pabrai would attribute it to strong near-term market positioning.
103.13%
OCF/share CAGR of 103.13% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest edge that can add up if momentum improves.
-1.85%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a firm-specific issue if peers still expand cash flow.
35.56%
3Y OCF/share growth of 35.56% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that could compound if momentum holds.
227.96%
Net income/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 7.41% over a decade. Joel Greenblatt might see a standout compounder of earnings.
16.17%
5Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 7.10%. Joel Greenblatt might see superior mid-term capital allocation or product strength.
27.56%
3Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 3.17%. Joel Greenblatt might see a recent surge from market share gains or cost synergy.
81.65%
Equity/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 7.34% over 10 years. Joel Greenblatt would see if a high ROE underlies this compounding advantage.
68.77%
5Y equity/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 9.63%. Joel Greenblatt sees a possible ROE advantage or fewer share issuances boosting book value.
101.75%
3Y equity/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 10.44%. Joel Greenblatt sees strong short-term returns on equity fueling net worth growth.
341.28%
Dividend/share CAGR of 341.28% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a minor improvement that could compound if the firm maintains consistent raises.
99.61%
5Y dividend/share CAGR of 99.61% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees at least some improvement that could compound over time.
37.84%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 37.84% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if the firm is at least inching up payouts.
1.02%
AR growth of 1.02% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if the difference points to new credit strategy or stronger sales push.
4.80%
Inventory growth of 4.80% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if we’re preparing for a sales push or risking overstock.
2.26%
Asset growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 0.07%. Joel Greenblatt confirms strong expansions matched by adequate returns on those assets.
4.34%
BV/share growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median. Joel Greenblatt checks if consistent ROE or undervalued buybacks fuel this advantage.
0.03%
Slightly rising debt while Technology median is deleveraging. Peter Lynch wonders if the firm lags behind peers in risk control or invests in more expansions.
-1.26%
R&D dropping while Technology median is rising. Seth Klarman wonders if we risk ceding future innovation or if peers overspend.
-1.95%
SG&A decline while Technology grows. Seth Klarman sees potential cost advantage or a risk if it hurts future growth.