PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-10.04%
Negative revenue growth while Technology median is 2.15%. Seth Klarman would investigate if the company is losing market share or facing a declining industry.
-13.64%
Negative gross profit growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect poor product pricing or inefficient production.
-18.51%
Negative EBIT growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check if external or internal factors caused the decline.
-18.97%
Negative operating income growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check if structural or cyclical issues are at play.
-19.78%
Negative net income growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate factors dragging net income down.
-20.21%
Negative EPS growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would explore whether share dilution or profit declines are to blame.
-19.46%
Negative diluted EPS growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would look for the cause: weakened profitability or heavier share issuance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.11%
Diluted share reduction while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if others are still diluting.
4.88%
Dividend growth of 4.88% while Technology median is flat. Walter Schloss might appreciate at least a modest improvement.
-0.67%
Negative OCF growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would ask if accounting or macro issues hamper the firm specifically.
75.57%
FCF growth of 75.57% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
61.04%
10Y revenue/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 28.92%. Joel Greenblatt would verify if a unique moat or brand fosters outperformance over a decade.
15.12%
5Y revenue/share growth 75-90% of Technology median of 18.02%. John Neff would expect a plan to align with peers or surpass them.
1.24%
3Y revenue/share growth below 50% of Technology median of 15.68%. Jim Chanos would suspect a significant short-term erosion in competitiveness.
91.92%
OCF/share CAGR of 91.92% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest edge that can add up if momentum improves.
-5.86%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a firm-specific issue if peers still expand cash flow.
-8.36%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check whether it’s cyclical or a firm-specific problem.
220.89%
Net income/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 20.83% over a decade. Joel Greenblatt might see a standout compounder of earnings.
16.14%
5Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 10.62%. Joel Greenblatt might see superior mid-term capital allocation or product strength.
-17.80%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Technology median is 4.09%. Seth Klarman might see a pressing concern if the rest of the sector is stable or growing.
87.00%
Equity/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 42.22% over 10 years. Joel Greenblatt would see if a high ROE underlies this compounding advantage.
97.18%
5Y equity/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 23.74%. Joel Greenblatt sees a possible ROE advantage or fewer share issuances boosting book value.
86.15%
3Y equity/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 14.75%. Joel Greenblatt sees strong short-term returns on equity fueling net worth growth.
333.29%
Dividend/share CAGR of 333.29% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a minor improvement that could compound if the firm maintains consistent raises.
68.41%
5Y dividend/share CAGR of 68.41% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees at least some improvement that could compound over time.
27.57%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 27.57% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if the firm is at least inching up payouts.
-9.56%
AR shrinking while Technology median grows. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage unless it signals declining demand.
2.33%
Inventory growth of 2.33% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if we’re preparing for a sales push or risking overstock.
2.24%
Asset growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 0.15%. Joel Greenblatt confirms strong expansions matched by adequate returns on those assets.
1.60%
BV/share growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median. Joel Greenblatt checks if consistent ROE or undervalued buybacks fuel this advantage.
5.05%
Debt growth of 5.05% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest difference that matters if interest coverage is tight.
-2.34%
R&D dropping while Technology median is rising. Seth Klarman wonders if we risk ceding future innovation or if peers overspend.
-3.10%
SG&A decline while Technology grows. Seth Klarman sees potential cost advantage or a risk if it hurts future growth.