PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-10.20%
Negative revenue growth while Technology median is -3.12%. Seth Klarman would investigate if the company is losing market share or facing a declining industry.
-13.82%
Negative gross profit growth while Technology median is -2.06%. Seth Klarman would suspect poor product pricing or inefficient production.
-14.40%
Negative EBIT growth while Technology median is -3.02%. Seth Klarman would check if external or internal factors caused the decline.
-16.11%
Negative operating income growth while Technology median is -5.16%. Seth Klarman would check if structural or cyclical issues are at play.
-19.40%
Negative net income growth while Technology median is -4.52%. Seth Klarman would investigate factors dragging net income down.
-19.33%
Negative EPS growth while Technology median is -2.04%. Seth Klarman would explore whether share dilution or profit declines are to blame.
-19.46%
Negative diluted EPS growth while Technology median is -2.50%. Seth Klarman would look for the cause: weakened profitability or heavier share issuance.
0.22%
Share growth above Technology median by more than 2x. Jim Chanos would suspect over-dilution or repeated equity raises.
0.22%
Diluted share change of 0.22% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight difference in equity issuance policy.
-0.05%
Dividend cuts while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others maintain or grow payouts, highlighting a relative weakness.
-47.14%
Negative OCF growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would ask if accounting or macro issues hamper the firm specifically.
-129.77%
Negative FCF growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others in the industry are still generating positive expansions in free cash.
45.79%
10Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x Technology median of 32.98%. Mohnish Pabrai would see if consistent reinvestment or product expansions drive this gap.
5.11%
Below 50% of Technology median. Jim Chanos would suspect structural disadvantages or a higher share base limiting per-share growth.
-13.52%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Technology median is 16.61%. Seth Klarman would examine if the sector is otherwise stable, indicating a company-specific issue.
161.49%
OCF/share CAGR of 161.49% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest edge that can add up if momentum improves.
-5.20%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a firm-specific issue if peers still expand cash flow.
-44.30%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check whether it’s cyclical or a firm-specific problem.
169.54%
Net income/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 43.81% over a decade. Joel Greenblatt might see a standout compounder of earnings.
-6.31%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Technology median is 37.04%. Seth Klarman might see a specific weakness if peers maintain profitable expansions.
-36.13%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Technology median is 14.33%. Seth Klarman might see a pressing concern if the rest of the sector is stable or growing.
89.97%
Equity/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 40.21% over 10 years. Joel Greenblatt would see if a high ROE underlies this compounding advantage.
105.71%
5Y equity/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 25.49%. Joel Greenblatt sees a possible ROE advantage or fewer share issuances boosting book value.
69.26%
3Y equity/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 12.56%. Joel Greenblatt sees strong short-term returns on equity fueling net worth growth.
332.40%
Dividend/share CAGR of 332.40% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a minor improvement that could compound if the firm maintains consistent raises.
68.60%
5Y dividend/share CAGR of 68.60% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees at least some improvement that could compound over time.
27.51%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 27.51% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if the firm is at least inching up payouts.
-6.49%
AR shrinking while Technology median grows. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage unless it signals declining demand.
2.10%
Inventory growth of 2.10% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if we’re preparing for a sales push or risking overstock.
7.84%
We expand assets while Technology is negative. Peter Lynch sees a possible advantage if expansions align with profitable markets or a recovering cycle.
0.29%
BV/share growth of 0.29% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight lead that can expand if sustained over time.
20.36%
Slightly rising debt while Technology median is deleveraging. Peter Lynch wonders if the firm lags behind peers in risk control or invests in more expansions.
3.91%
R&D growth of 3.91% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss wonders if a slight increase yields a meaningful competitive edge.
3.88%
Our SG&A slightly up while Technology is cutting. Peter Lynch wonders if we overspend or if the median underinvests in marketing.