PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
8.61%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 1.43%. Joel Greenblatt would verify if operating margins keep pace with this top-line surge.
11.90%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 3.69%. Joel Greenblatt would check if cost advantages or brand equity drive this surge.
22.28%
EBIT growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 7.39%. Joel Greenblatt would examine whether a unique competitive edge supports this outperformance.
24.52%
Operating income growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 5.36%. Joel Greenblatt would see if unique processes drive exceptional profitability.
20.85%
Net income growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 8.83%. Joel Greenblatt would check if brand strength or cost advantages fuel this outperformance.
20.33%
EPS growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 9.13%. Joel Greenblatt would confirm if consistent earnings expansion underpins these gains.
20.49%
Diluted EPS growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 9.13%. Joel Greenblatt would confirm if strong net income growth or buybacks drive outperformance.
0.11%
Share growth above Technology median by more than 2x. Jim Chanos would suspect over-dilution or repeated equity raises.
0.11%
Diluted share growth above 2x Technology median. Jim Chanos would suspect undue issuance or heavy employee stock compensation.
0.06%
Dividend growth of 0.06% while Technology median is flat. Walter Schloss might appreciate at least a modest improvement.
10.25%
OCF growth of 10.25% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest positive difference, which can compound over time.
-17.95%
Negative FCF growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others in the industry are still generating positive expansions in free cash.
37.66%
10Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x Technology median of 26.39%. Mohnish Pabrai would see if consistent reinvestment or product expansions drive this gap.
12.73%
5Y revenue/share growth 50-75% of Technology median of 20.10%. Guy Spier might worry about slower mid-term expansions vs. peers.
-9.62%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Technology median is 13.65%. Seth Klarman would examine if the sector is otherwise stable, indicating a company-specific issue.
45.40%
OCF/share CAGR of 45.40% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest edge that can add up if momentum improves.
-10.96%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a firm-specific issue if peers still expand cash flow.
-27.88%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check whether it’s cyclical or a firm-specific problem.
91.44%
Net income/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 39.93% over a decade. Joel Greenblatt might see a standout compounder of earnings.
-2.12%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Technology median is 38.96%. Seth Klarman might see a specific weakness if peers maintain profitable expansions.
-29.28%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Technology median is 21.05%. Seth Klarman might see a pressing concern if the rest of the sector is stable or growing.
91.46%
Equity/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 11.95% over 10 years. Joel Greenblatt would see if a high ROE underlies this compounding advantage.
96.82%
5Y equity/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 13.36%. Joel Greenblatt sees a possible ROE advantage or fewer share issuances boosting book value.
43.67%
3Y equity/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 8.58%. Joel Greenblatt sees strong short-term returns on equity fueling net worth growth.
332.01%
Dividend/share CAGR of 332.01% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a minor improvement that could compound if the firm maintains consistent raises.
68.60%
5Y dividend/share CAGR of 68.60% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees at least some improvement that could compound over time.
27.39%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 27.39% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if the firm is at least inching up payouts.
8.83%
AR growth of 8.83% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if the difference points to new credit strategy or stronger sales push.
4.63%
Inventory growth of 4.63% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if we’re preparing for a sales push or risking overstock.
0.78%
Asset growth 1.25-1.5x Technology median. Mohnish Pabrai sees if expansions are strategic and well-supported by end demand.
0.20%
Below 50% of Technology median. Jim Chanos suspects deeper issues blocking net worth accumulation.
4.92%
Slightly rising debt while Technology median is deleveraging. Peter Lynch wonders if the firm lags behind peers in risk control or invests in more expansions.
-1.20%
R&D dropping while Technology median is rising. Seth Klarman wonders if we risk ceding future innovation or if peers overspend.
-7.96%
SG&A decline while Technology grows. Seth Klarman sees potential cost advantage or a risk if it hurts future growth.