PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-3.47%
Negative revenue growth while Technology median is 3.44%. Seth Klarman would investigate if the company is losing market share or facing a declining industry.
-6.47%
Negative gross profit growth while Technology median is 3.16%. Seth Klarman would suspect poor product pricing or inefficient production.
-11.63%
Negative EBIT growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check if external or internal factors caused the decline.
-11.39%
Negative operating income growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check if structural or cyclical issues are at play.
-11.53%
Negative net income growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate factors dragging net income down.
-10.81%
Negative EPS growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would explore whether share dilution or profit declines are to blame.
-11.56%
Negative diluted EPS growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would look for the cause: weakened profitability or heavier share issuance.
-0.11%
Share reduction while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a relative advantage if others are diluting.
-0.11%
Diluted share reduction while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if others are still diluting.
4.58%
Dividend growth of 4.58% while Technology median is flat. Walter Schloss might appreciate at least a modest improvement.
15.36%
OCF growth of 15.36% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest positive difference, which can compound over time.
93.75%
FCF growth of 93.75% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
40.67%
10Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x Technology median of 28.38%. Mohnish Pabrai would see if consistent reinvestment or product expansions drive this gap.
22.37%
5Y revenue/share growth 1.25-1.5x Technology median of 18.66%. Mohnish Pabrai might attribute the outperformance to scale or brand strength.
-15.98%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Technology median is 9.74%. Seth Klarman would examine if the sector is otherwise stable, indicating a company-specific issue.
80.26%
OCF/share CAGR of 80.26% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest edge that can add up if momentum improves.
16.53%
OCF/share CAGR of 16.53% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that can compound if momentum builds.
-14.12%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check whether it’s cyclical or a firm-specific problem.
67.62%
Net income/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x Technology median. Mohnish Pabrai would confirm that management’s capital allocation strategy drives the outperformance.
15.21%
Below 50% of Technology median. Jim Chanos would suspect deeper problems limiting mid-term profit potential.
-42.90%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Technology median is 20.34%. Seth Klarman might see a pressing concern if the rest of the sector is stable or growing.
86.70%
Equity/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 42.97% over 10 years. Joel Greenblatt would see if a high ROE underlies this compounding advantage.
94.14%
5Y equity/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 27.24%. Joel Greenblatt sees a possible ROE advantage or fewer share issuances boosting book value.
28.44%
3Y equity/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 7.58%. Joel Greenblatt sees strong short-term returns on equity fueling net worth growth.
299.73%
Dividend/share CAGR of 299.73% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a minor improvement that could compound if the firm maintains consistent raises.
50.84%
5Y dividend/share CAGR of 50.84% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees at least some improvement that could compound over time.
18.30%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 18.30% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if the firm is at least inching up payouts.
-7.68%
AR shrinking while Technology median grows. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage unless it signals declining demand.
5.38%
Inventory growth of 5.38% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if we’re preparing for a sales push or risking overstock.
0.53%
Asset growth 50-75% of Technology median. Guy Spier sees potential underinvestment or overcaution vs. peers.
-2.01%
Negative BV/share change while Technology median is 0.38%. Seth Klarman sees a firm-specific weakness if peers accumulate net worth.
-6.71%
Debt is shrinking while Technology median is rising. Seth Klarman might see an advantage if growth remains possible.
-0.20%
R&D dropping while Technology median is rising. Seth Klarman wonders if we risk ceding future innovation or if peers overspend.
4.21%
SG&A growth far above Technology median. Jim Chanos sees potential red flags in cost management or diminishing returns on spending.