PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
1.55%
Positive revenue growth while Technology median is negative. Peter Lynch might see a relative strength advantage in a tough sector.
-0.04%
Negative gross profit growth while Technology median is -1.61%. Seth Klarman would suspect poor product pricing or inefficient production.
-5.71%
Negative EBIT growth while Technology median is -1.98%. Seth Klarman would check if external or internal factors caused the decline.
-3.85%
Negative operating income growth while Technology median is -4.16%. Seth Klarman would check if structural or cyclical issues are at play.
-2.16%
Negative net income growth while Technology median is -4.27%. Seth Klarman would investigate factors dragging net income down.
-2.27%
Negative EPS growth while Technology median is -1.62%. Seth Klarman would explore whether share dilution or profit declines are to blame.
-1.54%
Negative diluted EPS growth while Technology median is -2.16%. Seth Klarman would look for the cause: weakened profitability or heavier share issuance.
-0.22%
Share reduction while Technology median is 0.01%. Seth Klarman would see a relative advantage if others are diluting.
-0.33%
Diluted share reduction while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if others are still diluting.
0.06%
Dividend growth of 0.06% while Technology median is flat. Walter Schloss might appreciate at least a modest improvement.
-57.51%
Negative OCF growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would ask if accounting or macro issues hamper the firm specifically.
-134.00%
Negative FCF growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others in the industry are still generating positive expansions in free cash.
48.25%
10Y revenue/share CAGR near Technology median of 46.79%. Charlie Munger might expect stable industry trends guiding long-term growth.
25.05%
5Y revenue/share growth 75-90% of Technology median of 33.34%. John Neff would expect a plan to align with peers or surpass them.
-15.86%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Technology median is 13.19%. Seth Klarman would examine if the sector is otherwise stable, indicating a company-specific issue.
60.00%
OCF/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 29.07% over 10 years. Joel Greenblatt would verify if a unique competitive moat underlies these cash flows.
2.07%
5Y OCF/share growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 0.82%. Joel Greenblatt might see a strong moat or efficient cost structure driving outperformance.
-59.84%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while Technology median is 11.38%. Seth Klarman would check whether it’s cyclical or a firm-specific problem.
106.27%
Net income/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x Technology median. Mohnish Pabrai would confirm that management’s capital allocation strategy drives the outperformance.
2.74%
Below 50% of Technology median. Jim Chanos would suspect deeper problems limiting mid-term profit potential.
-45.67%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Technology median is 24.61%. Seth Klarman might see a pressing concern if the rest of the sector is stable or growing.
81.59%
Equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x Technology median. Mohnish Pabrai might credit disciplined reinvestment or conservative payout ratios for outperformance.
117.02%
5Y equity/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 38.13%. Joel Greenblatt sees a possible ROE advantage or fewer share issuances boosting book value.
18.72%
3Y equity/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 10.01%. Joel Greenblatt sees strong short-term returns on equity fueling net worth growth.
299.12%
Dividend/share CAGR of 299.12% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a minor improvement that could compound if the firm maintains consistent raises.
50.60%
5Y dividend/share CAGR of 50.60% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees at least some improvement that could compound over time.
18.13%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 18.13% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if the firm is at least inching up payouts.
77.72%
Slight AR growth while Technology cuts AR. Peter Lynch wonders if the firm is missing an opportunity to collect faster or if peers face sales declines.
3.53%
Inventory growth of 3.53% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if we’re preparing for a sales push or risking overstock.
-4.93%
Assets shrink while Technology median grows. Seth Klarman might see a strategic refocus or potential missed expansion if demand is present.
-2.73%
Negative BV/share change while Technology median is 0.06%. Seth Klarman sees a firm-specific weakness if peers accumulate net worth.
-5.50%
Debt is shrinking while Technology median is rising. Seth Klarman might see an advantage if growth remains possible.
5.30%
R&D growth of 5.30% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss wonders if a slight increase yields a meaningful competitive edge.
5.83%
Our SG&A slightly up while Technology is cutting. Peter Lynch wonders if we overspend or if the median underinvests in marketing.