PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
9.31%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 3.77%. Joel Greenblatt would verify if operating margins keep pace with this top-line surge.
11.33%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 6.41%. Joel Greenblatt would check if cost advantages or brand equity drive this surge.
14.74%
EBIT growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 8.43%. Joel Greenblatt would examine whether a unique competitive edge supports this outperformance.
18.05%
Operating income growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 10.21%. Joel Greenblatt would see if unique processes drive exceptional profitability.
9.84%
Net income growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 6.26%. Joel Greenblatt would check if brand strength or cost advantages fuel this outperformance.
10.85%
EPS growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 6.66%. Joel Greenblatt would confirm if consistent earnings expansion underpins these gains.
10.16%
Diluted EPS growth 1.25-1.5x Technology median of 7.33%. Mohnish Pabrai might attribute the gap to effective capital allocation.
-0.22%
Share reduction while Technology median is 0.13%. Seth Klarman would see a relative advantage if others are diluting.
-0.44%
Diluted share reduction while Technology median is 0.04%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if others are still diluting.
-0.02%
Dividend cuts while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others maintain or grow payouts, highlighting a relative weakness.
119.08%
OCF growth of 119.08% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest positive difference, which can compound over time.
302.55%
FCF growth of 302.55% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
56.74%
10Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x Technology median of 41.54%. Mohnish Pabrai would see if consistent reinvestment or product expansions drive this gap.
38.54%
5Y revenue/share growth 1.25-1.5x Technology median of 32.06%. Mohnish Pabrai might attribute the outperformance to scale or brand strength.
-13.53%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Technology median is 17.14%. Seth Klarman would examine if the sector is otherwise stable, indicating a company-specific issue.
158.33%
OCF/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 2.30% over 10 years. Joel Greenblatt would verify if a unique competitive moat underlies these cash flows.
9.09%
5Y OCF/share growth 50-75% of Technology median. Guy Spier would worry about a persistent shortfall vs. peers.
6.59%
3Y OCF/share growth > 1.5x Technology median of 0.43%. Joel Greenblatt might see a recent competitive advantage translating into cash improvements.
111.90%
Net income/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 69.09% over a decade. Joel Greenblatt might see a standout compounder of earnings.
-5.33%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Technology median is 57.95%. Seth Klarman might see a specific weakness if peers maintain profitable expansions.
-42.73%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Technology median is 26.96%. Seth Klarman might see a pressing concern if the rest of the sector is stable or growing.
83.06%
Equity/share CAGR of 83.06% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage in net worth accumulation that could matter long term.
116.48%
5Y equity/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 17.62%. Joel Greenblatt sees a possible ROE advantage or fewer share issuances boosting book value.
17.94%
3Y equity/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 2.98%. Joel Greenblatt sees strong short-term returns on equity fueling net worth growth.
297.32%
Dividend/share CAGR of 297.32% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a minor improvement that could compound if the firm maintains consistent raises.
51.38%
5Y dividend/share CAGR of 51.38% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees at least some improvement that could compound over time.
18.05%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 18.05% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if the firm is at least inching up payouts.
-36.69%
AR shrinking while Technology median grows. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage unless it signals declining demand.
2.67%
Inventory growth of 2.67% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if we’re preparing for a sales push or risking overstock.
3.48%
Asset growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt confirms strong expansions matched by adequate returns on those assets.
0.20%
Below 50% of Technology median. Jim Chanos suspects deeper issues blocking net worth accumulation.
9.30%
Slightly rising debt while Technology median is deleveraging. Peter Lynch wonders if the firm lags behind peers in risk control or invests in more expansions.
1.93%
R&D growth of 1.93% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss wonders if a slight increase yields a meaningful competitive edge.
2.75%
SG&A growth far above Technology median. Jim Chanos sees potential red flags in cost management or diminishing returns on spending.