PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Gauges a company's financial stability and solvency. Value investors pay close attention to leverage and liquidity risk, ensuring the company has enough cushion to withstand downturns without impairing shareholder value.
0.51
D/E of 0.51 while MPWR has all-equity financing. Bruce Berkowitz would demand higher returns to justify our leverage.
6.56
Net debt while MPWR maintains net cash position. John Neff would demand higher returns to justify the additional leverage risk.
17.38
Positive coverage while MPWR shows negative coverage. John Neff would examine our competitive advantages in a challenging market.
2.24
Current ratio below 50% of MPWR's 8.11. Jim Chanos would check for potential working capital crisis.
36.87%
Intangibles of 36.87% while MPWR has none. Bruce Berkowitz would demand evidence of superior returns on intangible investments.