205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Gauges a company's financial stability and solvency. Value investors pay close attention to leverage and liquidity risk, ensuring the company has enough cushion to withstand downturns without impairing shareholder value.
0.34
D/E of 0.34 while MRVL has all-equity financing. Bruce Berkowitz would demand higher returns to justify our leverage.
1.41
Net debt while MRVL maintains net cash position. John Neff would demand higher returns to justify the additional leverage risk.
69.42
Coverage of 69.42 while MRVL has no interest expense. Bruce Berkowitz would demand higher returns to justify our leverage.
3.29
Current ratio 1.25-1.5x MRVL's 2.41. Mohnish Pabrai would examine if this strength creates buying power advantages.
34.56%
Similar intangibles to MRVL's 38.16%. David Dodd would investigate if industry intangible norms reflect economic reality.