205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Gauges a company's financial stability and solvency. Value investors pay close attention to leverage and liquidity risk, ensuring the company has enough cushion to withstand downturns without impairing shareholder value.
0.32
D/E of 0.32 while MRVL has all-equity financing. Bruce Berkowitz would demand higher returns to justify our leverage.
1.52
Net debt while MRVL maintains net cash position. John Neff would demand higher returns to justify the additional leverage risk.
69.56
Positive coverage while MRVL shows negative coverage. John Neff would examine our competitive advantages in a challenging market.
4.39
Similar current ratio to MRVL's 4.44. Guy Spier would investigate if industry liquidity norms make sense for both companies.
35.44%
Intangibles 50-75% of MRVL's 45.18%. Guy Spier would examine if lower intangibles provide competitive cost advantages.