PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-3.31%
Revenue decline while AMD shows 11.28% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
52.89%
Cost growth above 1.5x AMD's 6.70%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
-58.24%
Gross profit decline while AMD shows 14.03% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-56.81%
Margin decline while AMD shows 2.47% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-66.92%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-9.09%
Total costs reduction while AMD shows 1.12% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
223.81%
EBITDA growth exceeding 1.5x AMD's 23.17%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
228.05%
EBITDA margin growth exceeding 1.5x AMD's 10.68%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
250.00%
Operating income growth exceeding 1.5x AMD's 60.06%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
255.14%
Operating margin growth exceeding 1.5x AMD's 43.84%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
100.00%
Similar other expenses growth to AMD's 98.26%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry patterns.
212.50%
Income change of 212.50% while AMD is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
216.35%
Margin change of 216.35% while AMD is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
-20.69%
Tax expense reduction while AMD shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
147.06%
Net income growth while AMD declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
148.67%
Net margin growth while AMD declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
148.23%
EPS change of 148.23% while AMD is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
148.23%
Diluted EPS change of 148.23% while AMD is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
-29.30%
Share count reduction while AMD shows 0.00% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-29.30%
Diluted share reduction while AMD shows 0.00% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.