205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-2.31%
Revenue decline while AMD shows 0.35% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-4.95%
Cost reduction while AMD shows 15.04% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
2.08%
Positive growth while AMD shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
4.49%
Margin expansion while AMD shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-1.79%
R&D reduction while AMD shows 14.45% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-7.56%
Operating expenses reduction while AMD shows 6.49% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-5.72%
Total costs reduction while AMD shows 11.93% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
60.24%
D&A growth above 1.5x AMD's 10.57%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
59.31%
EBITDA growth while AMD declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
63.07%
EBITDA margin growth while AMD declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
24.74%
Operating income growth while AMD declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
27.68%
Operating margin growth while AMD declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-82.46%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
6.98%
Pre-tax income growth while AMD declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
9.50%
Pre-tax margin growth while AMD declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
7.50%
Tax expense growth while AMD reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
587.55%
Net income growth while AMD declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
603.78%
Net margin growth while AMD declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
558.82%
EPS growth while AMD declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
568.75%
Diluted EPS growth while AMD declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
0.89%
Share count increase while AMD reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
0.76%
Diluted share increase while AMD reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.