205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-9.93%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
2.50%
Cost increase while AMD reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
-29.32%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-21.54%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-55.74%
R&D reduction while AMD shows 0.86% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-39.72%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-15.94%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
12.31%
D&A growth above 1.5x AMD's 4.17%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
70.19%
EBITDA growth while AMD declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
66.90%
EBITDA margin growth while AMD declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
89.00%
Operating income growth while AMD declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
87.79%
Operating margin growth while AMD declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-11.36%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
110.90%
Pre-tax income growth while AMD declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
112.10%
Pre-tax margin growth while AMD declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-94.39%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
103.86%
Net income growth while AMD declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
104.28%
Net margin growth while AMD declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
105.56%
EPS change of 105.56% while AMD is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
105.56%
Diluted EPS change of 105.56% while AMD is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
0.07%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x AMD's 1.82%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
0.33%
Diluted share increase while AMD reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.